Wednesday, April 27, 2011

new Census #'s out; help redistrict Dutchess on CRREO maps in New Paltz!...

Hi all...

Yesterday we participated in our Co. Leg.'s Redistricting Steering Committee mtg. (come to next one-- Tues. May 3rd 4:30 pm on the sixth floor of our County Office Building 22 Market St. Poughkeepsie)!...

Now-- with all due respect to the good folks of SUNY-New Paltz's Center for Research Regional Education and Outreach (CRREO), I humbly do submit to you that a new map for our Co. Leg. districts can be drawn without needlessly pitting Sandy Goldberg vs. Rob Weiss in the same districtz(!), without pitting Steve White vs. Rob Rolison in the same district(!), without pitting Jim Doxsey vs. D.J. Sadowski in the same district, and without pitting Suzanne Horn vs. Michael Kelsey in the same district (frankly)...
[...yes, believe it or not, the folks at CRREO have already presented us all with a hypothetical plan!...]

However-- I will say this-- I give a lot of credit to CRREO's Research Associate Josh Simons-- because he's offered us the opportunity to use their reapportionment software there to draw our OWN map(s)!...

So-- who's down for this?...

Let me know!....(asap)...

Tomorrow morning I'll be in front of our County Office Building at 22 Market St. in Poughkeepsie-- willing to carpool over to CRREO offices (7th floor of Haggerty Building on SUNY-New Paltz campus) to meet Josh Simons at 10 am there-- he's made commitment to let us play w/software to make our map(s)!...

[there are a number of options for redistricting software for our county; Josh/CRREO are using http://www.ESRI.com ; http://www.MoonShadowMobile.com is what Co. Leg. Clerk Patty Hohmann recently found (more inexpensive alternative?)....and Ulster Co. Leg. Reapportionment Committee folks are usiing Autobound -- http://www.citygategis.co/autobound9.htm (more expensive?)]

If you care-- you'll be there tomorrow 9:30 am in front of 22 Market St. Pok. to carpool over there!...

[pass it on]

Joel
444-0599/876-2488
http://www.DutchessDemocracy.blogspot.com

p.s. Don't forget-- crucial "Fair Redistricting" forum comin' up tomorrow Thurs. Apr. 28 7 pm at Friends Meeting House at 249 Hooker Ave. in Poughkeepsie with expert speakers Dare Thompson (Pres. of Mid-Hudson League of Women Voters) and Barbara Bartoletti (Leg. Dir. for http://www.LWVNY.org )!...

p.p.s. Again-- we need any of you that might be interested to let us know asap if you might be interested in being part of a Citizens Redistricting Committee for Dutchess (similar to state-level Citizens Redistricting Committee Common Cause is putting together)-- and-- we need you to let us know asap if you might be interested in joining us for a rally asap in front of Saland/Miller's offices at 3 Neptune Rd. in Poughkeepsie (just north of Red Lobster off Rt. 9) for independent redistricting-- come on, folks!...
[Uls. model: http://www.co.ulster.ny.us/reapportionment/index.html http://www.CitizensRedistrictNY.org ]

#############################################

[recall below sent out previously on all this]

It's one thing, for instance, for me to ask (as I have repeatedly) Co. Leg. Chair Rolison why he can't simply follow the good example of Ulster County, NYC, and 18 states across the country, and make the county's redistricting software available to Dutchess taxpayers for citizens to come up with own plans...

[as in Ulster Co.: where residents there have been able to do this at county Planning Dept. offices there; for instance, Ulster resident Michael Baden (not officially part of Reapportionment Comm.) made map]

It's another thing altogether for YOU folks to come out in force and mobilize in numbers to (politely) pose the very same question to Rolison-- as a group (not just as one person-- as I have done repeatedly)...

So-- ball's in your court, folks...(feel free to email him directly-- at countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us!).

Fact: The NYC Council and its Redistricting Commission have decided to make available to NYC residents redistricting software at quite a few public locations throughout the city, according to Common Cause NY Executive Director Susan Lerner in her speech to us recently in Rhinebeck-- and "in 2002, at least 26 states made demographic or political data available and accessible, and at least 18 states provided public access to computers or redistricting software."
[see: http://www.brennan.3cdn.net/7182a7e7624ed5265d_6im622teh.pdf -- from p. 41 of the Brennan Center for Justice "Citizen's Guide to Redistricting"; for more on this see http://www.brennancenter.org ]

Email all 25 of us at countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us for the same courtesy to be extended here!...

[weeks ago I asked Chair Rolison this personally and by email-- he has refused to make commitment]

#################################################

[["Ulster Has Plan for Redistricting" by Michael Novinson (Thursday's Times Herald-Record)
http://www.features.rr.com/article/02JV0inaBgcLT?q=Ulster ]

[recall below info/update on this sent out to you all last Sun. Apr. 10th]

Join LWV's Barbara Bartoletti and Dare Thompson for crucial redistricting forum Apr. 28!...


[it's not every day NYSLWV Leg. Dir. Barbara Bartoletti comes to Pok. to speak-- start spreadin' word!...J]

[and again-- see http://www.CitizensRedistrictNY.org -- great model/example for us here in Dutchess-- and PLEASE let us know if you'd like to serve on our CITIZENS Redistricting Committee for our county!]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From: Dare Thompson

Subject: Fair Redistricting meeting, Thu. April 28, 7 pm, POK Friends Mtg House

Please hold the date of Thursday, April 28, 7 pm for a meeting on redistricting that the League of Women Voters of the Mid-Hudson Region is sponsoring at the Poughkeepsie Friends Meeting House, 249 Hooker Ave.
Barbara Bartoletti, the state League's volunteer legislative director for the past thirty years, will fill you in on the latest developments on redistricting legislation at the state and talk about what Dutchess can do about the partisan redistricting process locally.
If you've heard Barbara before or caught her on TV, you know she's a very seasoned and entertaining good government lobbyist.
Meanwhile, those of you who have Assemblyman Joel Miller, please contact him to ask that he support fair redistricting legislation as other Assembly members from this area (Cahill, Kirwan, and Molinaro) have done. We are particularly pushing Gov. Cuomo's bill, which is A 05388, since it has the most support, but a bill sponsored by Assemblyman Jeffries (A03432) is also good.

[ed. note-- call Miller, Saland, Ball, Bonacic, all state legislators toll-free on this-- at (877) 255-9417!]

A bigger stumbling block is the state Senate. They've passed legislation sponsored by Sen. Bonacic which would provide a fairer (though not great) process of redistricting but it would require a constitutional amendment, thus putting off change for another decade. This lets those who pledged to support fair redistricting off the hook unless we raise a hue and cry. Let your senator (probably Saland or Ball) know that this won't do. Written letters (on paper) are best, phone calls next best, emails okay if that's all you have time for.

I hope to you on the 28th when Barbara can give us the latest news. The state legislators know that they need to polish their image - now's the decade to push this issue really hard!

Dare

PS - If you want to see what our non-partisan commission is doing in Ulster County, go to http://www.co.ulster.ny.us/reapportionment/index.html

Dare Thompson, President
League of Women Voters of the Mid-Hudson Region

##################################################

[recall below sent out on this Mar. 30th; sadly, Rolison/GOP have yet to agree to share software-- why?]

Re: redistricting-- NYC, Ulster, 18 states make software available-- letter to Rolison here...


[just sent this to Co. Leg. Chair Rolison-- email him-- and us all: countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us!]

[...if enough of u send emails to Rolison and GOP on this they just might share redistricting software!...]

[fair redistricting IS crucial-- equal population, minority representation, contiguity, compactness, making sure all communities of interest are fully and fairly there, making sure prisoners are only counted as part of their HOME population-- in order to stop politicians choosing voters, eliminating incumbents/challengers, packing partisans, diluting minority votes, and splitting communities-- all this!]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


From: Joel Tyner

To: roli213@aol.com


Subject: Rob-- let's follow Brennan Center/NYC model-- make redistricting software available....


Hi Rob...
The New York City Council and its Redistricting Commission have decided to make available to NYC residents redistricting software at quite a few public locations throughout the city, according to Common Cause NY Executive Director in her speech to us last Thursday in Rhinebeck-- and "in 2002, at least 26 states made demographic or political data available and accessible, and at least 18 states provided public access to computers or redistricting software"...
[see: http://www.brennan.3cdn.net/7182a7e7624ed5265d_6im622teh.pdf -- from p. 41 of the Brennan Center for Justice "Citizen's Guide to Redistricting"; for more on this see http://www.brennancenter.org ]

This is also being done, in effect, just across the river in Ulster County, through its nonpartisan Commission on Reapportionment, as Mid-Hudson League of Women Voters President Dare Thompson told me recently (she's a member of that Commission-- and the software is being made available to her, to share at will with members of the public interested in coming up with their own redistricting plans)...

[see: http://www.co.ulster.ny.us/legislature.html -- mtg. minutes from their Feb. 16th, Feb. 9th, Jan. 26th, and Jan. 19th meetings are all there online-- we have much to learn from Ulster's Commission there]
Hopefully you agree with me that the taxpayers of Dutchess County are entitled to the same thing here-- the right to at least a copy or two or three of the same redistricting software the County Legislature's redistricting committee will be using-- and the right to go to several public locations throughout the county (as in NYC) to research this and come up with their own plans (the better to advise us with)...

[...and again-- about twenty states across the U.S. have been doing this for many years; we need to too!]
We only redistrict once every ten years here-- let's get it right-- for the sake of all of us...

Joel
444-0599

p.s. Also-- please let me know asap when/where our first mtg. is, k?...thx....

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Again...

Thx TONS to all of you out there who came out to our forum last Thurs. night at Rhinebeck Village Hall with Susan Lerner & Dare Thompson-- Susan Lerner: Common Cause NY Executive Director; Dare Thompson: Mid-Hudson LWV President, Cablevision, our County Legislature's Minority Leader Sandy Goldberg, former Co. Leg. Bill McCabe, former Co. Leg. Clerk Barbara Hugo, former Hyde Park Town Boardmember Doris Kelly, former GOP Rhinebeck Town Boardmember Paul Niedercorn, Dick Hathaway, Fred and Jean Doneit, Mark Stern, Jeff Romano, Jillian Egan, Frances Sandiford, Rich Carlson, Judy Malstrom, Lee Jameson of Stuyvesant, and Bill Parker of http://www.CCScoop.com !...

But last Thursday night was only a start...

If we're truly going to get off the ground a county-level Citizens Redistricting Committee for Dutchess (similar to what Common Cause is doing on state level), Thurs. night really was ONLY just a start!...

[see http://www.CitizensRedistrictNY.org for state-level version of this we need to copy for Dutchess]

We need as MANY of you as possible to come out to join us for our follow-up meeting on all this-- tonite: Weds. Mar. 30th at 5:30 pm at the Palace Diner at 194 Washington St. in Poughkeepsie!...(pass it on)...

Check out http://www.CitizensRedistrictNY.org -- Common Cause is setting up a statewide Citizens Redistricting Committee because GOP Senators like Saland have reneged on promise they made last fall to put into place independent redistricting now (we need your help to do the same for Dutchess!)...

[Common Cause are among the undisputed experts in NYS on this; if they're doing this we need to too]

So-- please let us know if you'd like to be on a Citizens Redistricting Committee for Dutchess County!...

[canNOT over-emphasize how important this is; even if we don't get what we want we need to push!]

[Dem Co. Leg. caucus has appointed yours truly to be point person on this countywide-- need your help; note as well too tho-- GOP Co. Leg. leadership not allowing Dems to appoint anyone else to committee!]

Also-- check out http://www.co.ulster.ny.us/legislature.html -- Mid-Hudson LWV Pres. Dare Thompson is member; minutes for Ulster Commission on Reapportionment are all online at the official Ulster County Legislature website-- model for Dutchess(!)....(heck might freeze over, sadly, before GOP do this here)...

For much more on all this see http://www.EndGerrymandering.com -- and these four websites as well:
http://www.AmericansforRedistrictingReform.org ; http://www.ElectionLawBlog.org ;
http://www.BrennanCenter.org/content/pages/redistricting_for_advocates ; http://www.FairVote.org .

[also see http://www.RedistrictingGame.org -- who out there could help us set up local wifi challenge?]

Recall-- in January this year the GOP Co. Leg. majority decided to actually override Steinhaus' veto of their effort to gerrymander co. leg. districts(!)...(repealing Dem law)...

[remember-- back in '09 former Dem Co. Leg. majority passed McCabe law for independent redistricting]

Fact: "In over 2500 general election races in the past 24 years, a challenger has beaten an incumbent only 34 times, and the difference in enrollments between the two major parties is close enough in only 25 of the 212 legislative districts (11 percent) to permit competitive elections on a frequent basis."
[from Common Cause NY info @ http://www.CitizensRedistrictNY.org ]

[NYTimes Feb. 23: "Pledge? What Pledge?" http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/23/opinion/23wed3.html ]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://www.PoughkeepsieJournal.com Dec. 17th...

[GOP already now have 18 of 25 seats, folks-- "Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely."]

[Lord Acton is just as pertinent here and now today as he was back then-- wake up, folks!]

Bring fairness to Dutchess redistricting

DECEMBER 17, 2010

The majority of Dutchess County Republican legislators made a perfectly dreadful decision by opting to scrap an independent review of how legislative districts should be redrawn.
This review had no downside for anyone who cares about a fair and clean process. Lawmakers owe it to the public to reconsider this position, especially since they took this vote about 1:30 a.m. after saying hours earlier that the matter was not on the board's agenda that night.

Democratic leaders, with some Republican support, passed legislation last year aimed at lessening the politics that inevitably goes into any redistricting plan. Democrats controlled the Legislature back then and voted to create an independent, nonpartisan committee that would decide where the legislative boundaries ought to be. That way, fears of gerrymandering - watching politicians themselves set up political boundaries to possibly gain an electoral advantage - would be abated.

Legislative districts have to be redrawn every 10 years based on the most recent census data.
But, after lawmakers finished worked on the approximate $403 million county budget last week, a majority of Republicans voted to repeal the 2009 law, replacing it with one that puts decisions on redistricting straight back in the hands of a legislative committee that will have a GOP majority.

The 2009 law called for the creation of a five-person redistricting commission of two Democrats, two Republicans and a fifth member to be chosen by the other four. None of those serving on the commission was going to be permitted to hold political office or to be a member of a political party committee.

But the majority of GOP lawmakers balked, arguing, in part, that the Legislature shouldn't abrogate its responsibilities by deferring to a commission. Some also argued, in a bit of twisted logic, that a citizens commission might lead to more political hostilities and could actually slow the redistricting process.

To that, we offer several points:

Legislators still were going to have a final say on redistricting under the 2009 law, though one would have hoped they would have abided by the commission's recommendation unless they could show a compelling reason to do otherwise.

Throughout the country and the state, there have been excellent efforts to set up redistricting commissions, to give a little distance between the process and the lawmakers who might benefit by the results. Throughout this year's campaign season, for instance, former New York City Mayor Ed Koch and his New York Uprising political action committee pushed for such redistricting reforms, too.

Some might have forgotten the painful redistricting process in Dutchess after the 2000 Census. In all fairness, that reapportionment committee also had the task of drawing boundaries for 25 districts instead of 35 because residents had voted in 1997 to reduce the number of legislators. Nevertheless, the process got bogged down repeatedly, with political sniping between the two parties. The initial redistricting plan failed back then, leading to weeks of legal disputes and costing taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars.

Last week, the six Democrats on the Legislature - Minority Leader Sandra Goldberg, Assistant Minority Leader Dan Kuffner, Steve White, Barbara Jeter-Jackson, Joel Tyner and Allison MacAvery - had every good reason to vote against repealing the wise 2009 accord. They were joined by Conservative James Doxsey, and, to their credit, three Republicans - Legislative Chairman Robert Rolison, Angela Flesland and Marge Horton, in opposing the Republican plan.

But the change passed, with 14 Republicans voting in favor -Suzanne Horn, Dale Borchert, Donald Sadowski, Kenneth Roman, Robert Weiss, Donna Bolner, Joseph Incoronato, John Forman, Gary Cooper, Benjamin Traudt, Gerald Hutchings, John Thomes, Alan Surman and Michael Kelsey. (Republican James Miccio did not attend the meeting due to a death in the family.)

We urge lawmakers who voted for this repeal to reconsider - and for all lawmakers to find a reasonable path for redistricting that gets the job done but gives an independent commission the chance to take politics out of the equation as much as possible.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[recall this beautiful Daily Freeman editorial on all this]

EDITORIAL: Dutchess darkness
Published: Tuesday, December 14, 2010
It's not unusual for thieves to practice their craft in the dead of night, the better to get away with it.

Presumably, this explains the timing of Republican members of the Dutchess County Legislature, who voted at 1:45 a.m. Dec. 8 to take back control of the process for drawing new election district lines.

The vote came after six and a half hours of wrangling before a final vote on the 2011 Dutchess County budget.

Republicans argued that allowing a citizen commission to draft the lines of county legislative districts under a 2009 local law somehow would turn redistricting into "a partisan political thing," as Legislator Michael Kelsey, R-Pleasant Valley, put it.
Somehow, they argued, putting themselves in charge of redrawing the lines for themselves would be the more responsible thing to do.

This doesn't meet the laugh test.
To put it bluntly, they're lying. There is nothing about drawing political lines for yourself that serves the public interest. It is self-serving, pure and simple.

Gerald Benjamin, a SUNY New Paltz professor, notes that citizen commissions help keep the redistricting process honest, even if the legislative body ultimately must approve any plan.

"Self-interested behavior is present when people's careers, lives and status are at stake," Benjamin said. "Not only is that the case, but people believe that's the case, so it brings a level of cynicism to the process."

"To argue that (citizens) commissions are partisan is absurd," he said.

Benjamin is in a position to know. Not only did he help author the Ulster County Charter, which includes a provision for a citizens redistricting commission, but he also is a former Republican chairman of the Ulster County Legislature.

The failure to delegate the nuts and bolts of the redistricting process, Benjamin said, "diminishes public confidence and responsibility for the Legislature and representative form of government."

The matter now is in the hands of Dutchess County Executive William Steinhaus, who must hold a public hearing before acting on it.
Steinhaus, who has run for office all of his adult life in countywide elections that know no gerrymandering, should veto the repeal of the law and put redistricting back in the hands of a citizens commission.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[here below-- what first Dem Co. Leg. majority in 30 years passed last year-- that GOP repealed in Jan.]

[yes-- Rolison and Flesland this year voted to repeal this-- even tho back in 2009 they co-sponsored it!]

RESOLUTION NO. 209167

RE: LOCAL LAW NO. 4 OF 2009 A LOCAL LAW AMENDING THE DUTCHESS COUNTY CHARTER AS IT PERTAINS TO SECTION 2.01, COUNTY LEGISLATURE; MEMBERSHIP; ELECTION; TERM; REAPPORTIONMENT

Legislators MCCABE, HIGGINS, WASSELL, TYNER, FETTES, NASH, KELLER-COFFEY, JETTER-JACKSON, KUFFNER, MACAVERY, MANSFIELD, DOXSEY, FLESLAND, and HORTON offer the following and move its adoption:

RESOLVED, that this Legislature of the County of Dutchess adopt Local Law No. 4 of 2009, which has been submitted this day for consideration by said Legislature.

LOCAL LAW NO. 4 OF 2009

RE: A LOCAL LAW AMENDING THE DUTCHESS COUNTY CHARTER AS IT PERTAINS TO SECTION 2.01, COUNTY LEGISLATURE; MEMBERSHIP; ELECTION; TERM; REAPPORTIONMENT

BE IT ENACTED by the County Legislature of the County of Dutchess as follows:

SECTION 1: LEGISLATIVE INTENT:

Each citizen of Dutchess County should be assured equal and fair representation on the County Legislature. The Dutchess County Legislature provides for a reapportionment process, after each federal census that should fairly revise the boundaries of Legislative Districts recognizing the criteria of: 1) population equality; 2) contiguity; 3) unity of villages and towns; and 4) compactness. The process for reapportionment should be accomplished in a timely and fair manner. The County Legislature has determined that Section 2.01 of the County Charter of the County of Dutchess should be amended to provide for a Reapportionment Advisory Committee.

SECTION 2: AMENDMENT TO THE DUTCHESS COUNTY CHARTER:

Section 2.01 of the Charter of the County of Dutchess shall be amended to read as follows:

Section 2.01. County Legislature: Membership; Election; Term; Reapportionment.
(a) There shall be a County Legislature composed of Legislators elected from single member districts prescribed in such local laws of reapportionment as may from time to time be applicable. Each Legislator shall be deemed a County Officer and shall be elected at a general odd-numbered year election for a term of two years. At the time of nomination and election, and throughout the term of office, each Legislator shall be and remain an elector of the district from which he or she is elected.

(b) Hereafter, the County Legislature, by local law subject to permissive referendum, shall reapportion its membership within nine months after the publication of each federal decennial census in a manner consistent with constitutionally and legally accepted principles of legislative representation, but in no event shall the number of Legislators exceed twenty-five (25).

(c) Dutchess County Legislative District Boundaries shall be recommended by an advisory committee consisting of five (5) members, two of whom shall be appointed by the Majority Caucus and two of whom shall be appointed by the Minority Caucus. Upon the affirmative vote of no less than three such advisory committee members they shall select a fifth member to serve as its chairperson. No more than two members shall be of the same political party. No member of the advisory committee shall be employed by or hold any elected or appointed office and no member shall be an officer of any political party. The Legislative staff shall provide technical assistance for the committee sufficient to support its reasonable and necessary activities. Vacancies on the committee shall be filled in the same manner that the initial appointment was made. No member of the committee shall run for the Legislature within two years after serving as a member of the committee.

(d) The Advisory Committee shall consider as criteria the constitutionally and legally acceptable principles of representation, and it shall consider the following factors:

1. Population Equity.
2. Contiguity.
3. Unity of Villages and Towns.
4. Compactness.
(e) The Advisory Committee shall be formed no later than two (2) months after publication of each regular federal census. The Advisory Committee may conduct meetings and hearings at any place in Dutchess County as it deems necessary, shall keep records of its proceedings, and shall report from time to time to the Chairman of the County Legislature detailing the state of its progress. Within six (6) months of publication of the results of each regular federal census, the Advisory Committee shall submit to the County Legislature its recommendations for changes in the boundaries of Legislative Districts. The Advisory Committee's recommendations shall be in the form of a plan of redistricting. The Advisory Committee may submit one or more plans for consideration by the County Legislature, and a majority of the County Legislature may reject, adopt, or amend and adopt, a submitted plan. A majority of the County Legislature may also return a plan to the Advisory Committee with a list of objections for the Advisory Committee's consideration in forming a revised plan. Should the County Legislature return a plan to the Advisory Committee, the Advisory Committee shall have one (1) month to submit a revised plan. Should the Advisory Committee fail to submit a plan within the deadlines contained in this paragraph, the Advisory Committee is discharged and a majority of the County Legislature may adopt a plan of redistricting notwithstanding any work product or recommendations of the Advisory Committee.

(f) The members of the Advisory Committee shall serve without compensation and shall serve at the pleasure of their respective appointing authority. Each Advisory Committee shall expire thirty (30) days after the County Legislature has approved revisions in the boundaries of the Legislative Districts. If appropriate and legal revisions of the boundaries of Legislative Districts are not adopted by the County Legislature within nine (9) months of the publication of the results of the federal census, then the County Attorney is directed to make application to a court of appropriate jurisdiction for the appointment of a Special Master to prepare a redistricting plan for the Legislative Districts containing substantially equal citizen population and such other factors as required by law.


(g) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Charter to the contrary, such local law of reapportionment shall not be subject to disapproval by the County Executive but shall be subject to permissive referendum.

SECTION 3: SEPARABILITY:

If any part or provision of this Local Law or the application thereof to any person or circumstances be adjudged invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such judgment shall be confined in its operation to the part of the provision or application directly involved in the controversy in which judgment shall have been rendered and shall not affect or impair the validity of the remainder of this Local Law or the application thereof to other persons or circumstances, and the Dutchess County Legislature hereby declares that it would have passed this Local Law or the remainder thereof had such invalid application or invalid provision been apparent.

SECTION 4: EFFECTIVE DATE:
This Local Law shall take effect upon compliance with the applicable provisions of the Municipal Home Rule Law.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://www.PoughkeepsieJournal.com -- yesterday's editorial...(call Saland/all: 877-255-9417!)....

End the redistricting charade, senators

[AGAIN, FOLKS-- WHO'S DOWN FOR RALLY IN FRONT OF SALAND'S?!?]

It is disingenuous, at best, for any state lawmaker to hide behind a protracted process that could delay a fair and frank redistricting effort now, but that is precisely what is occurring in New York.

And three state senators from this area are guilty as well and have to end this charade.

District lines for state and congressional seats have to be redrawn every 10 years based on new census data; the state has an obligation to the public to do this right.

Historically, though, the process has been torturous and fraught with the worst in back-room politics. As a result, the public usually ends up with odd-shaped, bizarre political boundaries drawn, in part, to protect incumbents - and to give both Democrats and Republicans "safe" districts that are counter to fair and competitive elections.

This time, it has to be different. We urge three state representatives from the mid-Hudson Valley - Republicans Steve Saland of Poughkeepsie, Greg Ball of Patterson, and William Larkin of Cornwall- to get behind the drive to have impartial congressional and state district lines drawn as soon as possible. To date, these lawmakers have reneged on a pre-election pledge to support independent redistricting.

Their actions are indefensible. Their pledge was made to New York Uprising, led by former New York City Mayor Ed Koch, and the public took them at their word. Consequently, these lawmakers have now landed on New York Uprising's "Enemies of Reform" list for failing to follow through.

The area's other state senator, John Bonacic of Mount Hope, is not listed as an enemy because he is a co-sponsor of one of the two bills introduced in the state Senate to create an independent redistricting commission. Bonacic also backs a sound, long-term fix to the redistricting issue: Amending the state Constitution, something the other three support as well.

But changing the Constitution is a long, convoluted process. Legislation would have to be approved by two consecutive legislatures and then by voters. This couldn't be completed until 2013 at the earliest, and redistricting is supposed to be done before then and will set the boundaries in place for the next 10 years. Thus, a constitutional change wouldn't really apply until after the 2020 census was completed.

The public can't wait that long for reform.

There's no reason why lawmakers couldn't pass a stop-gap measure, appointing an independent commission this year to get to work on redistricting.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo has proposed legislation to that end. Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and more than half of the members of the Democrat-led Assembly have signed on to it. Cuomo says he will veto any redistricting plan passed by the Legislature that doesn't include a way to stop the lines from being drawn in a partisan fashion.

Remember, even with an independent commission, legislators wouldn't be relinquishing their authority to approve the redrawn map. Anything rejected would have to go back to the commission for amendments until a map was approved.

But this would shift the burden on lawmakers to make an objective, public case for change; they wouldn't be able to carve up the map in a series of closed-door meetings and trades that run counter to open government.

Supporting a reform effort that would have no real effect for 10 years clearly doesn't cut it. The senators must act with the sense of urgency that this issue demands.

What you can do

To contact the senators:

Sen. Steve Saland, R-Poughkeepsie
Room 503
State Capitol
Albany, NY 12247
518-455-2411
Email: saland@nysenate.gov
http://www.senatorsaland.com

Sen. Greg Ball, R-Carmel
817 Legislative Office Building
Albany, NY 12247
518-455-3111
Email: gball@nysenate.gov
http://www.ball.nysenate.gov

Sen. William Larkin, R-Cornwall
Room 502
State Capitol
Albany, NY 12247
518-455-2770
Email: larkin@nysenate.gov
http://www.larkin.nysenate.gov

Dutchess air quality rated "F" third in a row-- ten solutions to clean up county air!...

[sent this letter below to my 24 colleagues this morning-- please follow up with your own letters to them all at the email addresses below-- or at countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us!]

[250-word letters to editor still needed, folks-- send 'em to letterstoeditor@poughkeepsiejournal.com, letters@freemanonline.com, editorial@thehudsonvalleynews.com, newsplace.com-- absolutely crucial!...(I held press conference on all this earlier today; hardly anyone in local media paid attention-- why?)]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

To: roli213@aol.com, garycooper@fairpoint.net, angelaflesland@yahoo.com, sajgold@aol.com, dpkdcld7@aol.com, JRCDOXSEY@aol.com, cedarcrestfarm@gmail.com, dborchertdc03@gmail.com, DJS413@msn.com, DCLKenRoman@yahoo.com, whitelum@aol.com, jeterb@hvc.rr.com, ruger7@frontiernet.net, djbolner@optonline.net, joeincoronato@optonline.net, j_amaca@hotmail.com, jjjmiccio@verizon.net, jvforman@hotmail.com, bentraudt@yahoo.com, margehortondcleg@aol.com, hutchi3@verizon.net, JohnMThomes@aol.com, alansurman@optimum.net, kelseyesq@yahoo.com


Subject: Colleagues-- Dutchess air rated "F" third year in row-- let's clean our air these 10 ways...


Hi all...

MidHudsonNews.com is reporting this morning that once again Dutchess air has been ranked an "F" by the American Lung Association of NY (this is the third year in a row!...see: http://www.ALANY.org )...
[recall-- there are at least thirty thousand Dutchess residents with asthma, bronchitis, or emphysema!]

From http://www.midhudsonnews.com/News/2011/April/27/HV_air_ALA-27Apr11.html ...

Hudson Valley air still stagnant, says Lung Association report

ALBANY - The American Lung Association's State of the Air report released Wednesday shows no signs of improvement in the quality of Hudson Valley air.

Dutchess County earned an earned an "F" for ozone pollution with 15 orange days for ozone pollution, one more day than in 2010. Dutchess was one of only two counties in the state whose number of high ozone days increased when compared to last year.
Ulster is again the only county in the Hudson Valley to receive a passing grade for ozone pollution. The county earned a "C", the same as last year, and reduced its number of orange ozone days from six to three.

The lead author in the national State of the Air report, Janice Nolen, has concerns about the possible watering down of the Clean Air Act by Washington.

"The American Lung Association is working hard to fight to make sure that we take steps to clean up even more air pollution," she said. "We are calling for EPA to clean up some of the biggest sources remaining including coal fired power plants, existing diesel engines like trucks, buses, tractors and heavy equipment, to be able to provide the funding for cleaning up those additional resources."

So-- hopefully you'll agree with me that Dutchess County should clean our air these following ten ways:

[please let me know asap if you might agree with me on any of these-- we have no time to waste(!)]

1. New "Energize Dutchess" contest-- challenge our county's municipalities to see which town, city, or village can have the highest percentage of homeowners taking advantage of new 100% free home energy audits financed through Green Jobs Green NY; 90% of New Yorkers eligible (NYSERDA: 331-2238!).
Dutchess County homeowners and businesses could save $1 billion over the next ten years on energy efficiency alone according to Sustainable Hudson Valley Chair David Dell if retrofits made more available.
[ http://www.nyserda.org/GreenNY/; http://www.energyfinancesolutions.com/main/homeownersnyfour ;
http://www.dutchessdemocracy.blogspot.com/2009/03/our-bright-idea-growin-brighter-and.html ]

2. Solar panels on county buildings (on town buildings in Rhinebeck, Town of Poughkeepsie, Clinton).
[ http://www.VoteSolar.org ; http://www.PetitionOnline.com/SOLAR ; http://www.HVCE.com ]

3. Truly incentivize solar in Dutchess as in other counties; GOP County Executives in Orange, Rensselaer, and Rockland counties have all enacted county-level sales tax exemptions on sale/installation of residential solar panels; also NYC, Albany, Broome, Clinton, Columbia, Erie, Essex, Greene, Hamilton, Montgomery, Nassau, Oneida, Schuyler, Suffolk, Tompkins, Warren, and Yates counties.
[ http://www.tax.ny.gov/pdf/publications/sales/pub718s_510.pdf ]

4. Extend loans for solar and energy-efficiency to homeowners, as Town of Babylon has done for years.
[ http://www.LIGreenHomes.com ; http://www.petitiononline.com/pacehere ; http://www.PACEnow.org ]

5. Facilitate construction of solar farms all over Dutchess County as in Greene County; the Greene County Industrial Development Agency is working with CornerStone Power Development to facilitate the construction of a $60 million, 15-megawatt solar farm on 128 acres in Coxsackie just northwest of us.
[ http://greeneida.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/60M_solar_farm_coming_to_Coxsackie1.pdf ]

6. Effectively pressure Albany to pass new bipartisan Cahill/Bonacic legislation (A.5713/S.4178) for solar renewable energy credits to truly incentivize solar here in NYS as has been done already successfully in NJ and PA. Germany has less sunlight than NYS but has solar panels all over; Dr. Richard Perez of SUNY-Albany has conclusively proven that ALL of NYS's energy needs could be met completely by solar energy alone-- by merely covering 0.75% of the state's surface with photovoltaics; why can't we do this?
[ http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=A05713&term=2011 ;
http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?default_fld=%0D%0At&bn=S4178&Summary=Y ;
http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wamc/news.newsmain/article/0/2706/1788106/WAMC.News/New.York.Takes.A.Step.Toward.Solar ;
http://www.asrc.cestm.albany.edu/perez/publications/Other%20Papers%20and%20Applications/Is%20there%20really%20enough%20sun-07.pdf ]

7. Revenue-neutral "clean car" feebate: sales tax cut-- fuel-efficient cars; sales tax hike on gas guzzlers.
[ http://www.petitiononline.com/cleancar ; http://www.RMI.org -- endorsed by Rocky Mountain Institute]

8. Transform our county's bus and vehicle fleet as soon as possible to hybrids as in Westchester and NYC.
[ http://www.petitiononline.com/hybrids ]

9. Co-sponsor Air Quality forum w/Cary Institute, Scenic Hudson, Clearwater, Sustainable Hudson Valley.
[ http://www.CaryInstitute.org ; http://www.ScenicHudson.org ; http://www.Clearwater.org ; SustainHV.org]

10. Last but certainly not least-- and perhaps most importantly-- let's adopt an 85%-recycling-rate-by-2020 goal for Dutchess to move away from polluting incineration-- as endorsed statewide by Clearwater, Sierra Club, NYPIRG, EANY, Citizens Environmental Coalition-- "recycling saves four times the energy that incineration recovers." Recall-- the Poughkeepsie Journal reported last March 7th that emissions from our county incinerator of particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, and nitrogen oxide have all increased over the last decade-- along with the fact that, on an annual basis, our county incinerator also creates 50,000 tons of toxic ash-- and spews 29 pounds of heavy metals (mercury/arsenic/lead/cadmium), 37 tons of sulfur dioxide, 22 tons of hydrogen chloride/hydrogen fluoride, and 3700 tons of carbon dioxide-- along with literally 3700 tons of carbon emissions annually (being serious re: clean air means less incineration).
http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20100307/NEWS01/3070350/Burn-plants-seem-cleaner-but-facts-debated ; http://www.cectoxic.org/ZeroWastePlatform2010.html ; http://www.CARMA.org

So-- again-- please let me know if you might agree with me on any/all of these ways to clean up our air!...

Joel
444-0599

CEC Ex. Dir. Barbara Warren outraged re: Dutchess RRA, GOP, DEC-- wake up, folks!...

[recent letter here from Citizens Environmental Coalition Executive Director Barbara Warren to myself and area environmentalists from Orange and Dutchess counties and beyond-- most interesting!...(letters to editor needed on all this to local newspapers, folks!)...and emails to 25 of us at countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us!]

[recall-- Barbara is also the leader beyond the New York State Zero Waste Alliance!]
http://www.cectoxic.org/ZeroWaste.html -- check out this just in to us from Barbara-- "Guess what is the most costly way to make electricity? Garbage Incineration! At $8232/kW for capital costs it is more costly than other ways of generating electricity by a very wide margin. Operating costs are the highest too; see:
http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/beck_plantcosts/pdf/updatedplantcosts.pdf !"]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From: Barbara Warren

To: Katherine Bourbeau, Glen Silver, Linda Ochs, Michael Edelstein, Joel Tyner, James Travers, Tom Ellis

Subject: Urgent Alert & Action Needed Re: Solid Waste Planning for Local Planning Units

Date: April 7, 2011

Hi All,

Many planning units are required to update their solid waste plans in the near future. Unfortunately I have received recent indications that specific requirements related to public involvement and comment on solid waste plans is being given little attention. I am attempting to better clarify this situation.

However, at this time we know of at least one County [Dutchess] where the solid waste plan has been submitted and no public involvement has yet occurred. At a forum yesterday a DEC representative [DEC Region 3 Recycling Coordinator Theresa Laibach] described a process whereby DEC first determines a plan is approvable and then sends it back to the planning unit for final approval. What this allows is no PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT in the planning process. Please see especially item p) below. If DEC is receiving a plan for review it should contain a section that describes the full public process and the comments and views of the public. If that is not in the submitted plan, DEC should not be acting on it.

In the case of Dutchess County the DEC described a situation where the County had turned over planning to the Resource Recovery Agency -- the ones in charge of running the incinerator. The public is concerned that this could mean a plan for incinerator expansion.

In the case of Orange County, we believe the plan will direct garbage to the new planned gasification facility.
DEC Solid Waste Regulations are in Part 360.

Subpart 360-15: Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Planning
Section 9 Plan Contents

(o) a description of the measures used to secure participation of neighboring jurisdictions, any limitations which the plan's implementation would impose on the neighboring jurisdictions' solid waste management programs, and the effects of including the jurisdiction in the plan, including additional viable alternatives; and

(p) an accounting, to the maximum extent practicable, for the comments and views expressed by concerned governmental, environmental, commercial, and industrial interests, the public, and neighboring jurisdictions.

ACTION Needed.

We need a Sign On Letter of all interested individuals and groups within each planning unit indicating 1) their views on how materials and solid waste should be managed, and 2) that the plan must increase diversion from disposal to be consistent with state law and 3) citing the regulatory requirement that plans must adequately address the views of the people in the planning unit.

More Info Soon !

Barbara J. Warren
Executive Director
Citizens' Environmental Coalition
33 Central Ave.
Albany, NY 12210
518-462-5527/ 845-754-7951 H
warrenba@msn.com
www.cectoxic.org

#######################################################

[recall below posted to my email list on all this yesterday]

re: [HudsonValley] Dutchess County Resource Recovery Agency is a flop.
Date: Apr 26, 2011 11:43 AM


[thx tons to intrepid Doreen Tignanelli of Town of Poughkeepsie for passin' this along < MHNews.com]


[SPEAK UP: next Co. Leg. mtg.-- Mon. May 9th 7 pm 6th floor of COB 22 Market St. Poughkeepsie!]


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


From: Doreentig@aol.com [Town of Poughkeepsie's intrepid Doreen Tignanelli]


Subject: Dutchess County Resource Recovery Agency is a flop. [MidHudsonNews.com today!]


Date: Apr 26, 2011 8:37 AM


http://www.midhudsonnews.com/News/2011/April/26/DCRRA_ILSR-26Apr11.html

Sustainability advocate says Dutchess RRA is a "financial albatross"

POUGHKEEPSIE - The leader of a Washington, DC-based sustainability organization says the Dutchess County Resource Recovery Agency is a flop.


Neil Seldman, president of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, spoke ill of the facility.


"The Dutchess County incinerator should be phased out immediately," he said. "It is a financial albatross on that county. This past year their subsidy was over $5 million. It's rising every year; it used to be $1 million about five years ago and the plant is not working well."

Doreen Tignanelli

"Information is the oxygen in which the fire of democracy burns. If you have information, it burns, if you don't, it chokes". D. DeBar


###################################################


[recall quote from yours truly on all this from front page of last Friday's Poughkeepsie Journal-- here:
"Joel Tyner, D-Clinton, the ranking Democrat on the Legislature's environment committee, said he was disappointed in the draft report, in part because he believed it did not place enough emphasis on recycling. 'This (report) ignores the recycling dollars that are potentially available to the county,' Tyner said. 'It's always cheaper to get rid of your garbage once you get a lot of it recycled and composted. We can make money on this.'"]


[NY = MD; see http://ccgovernment.carr.org/ccg/pubworks/sw-future/docs/resource-assessment.pdf ]


[and again-- if you haven't yet-- join 80+ other county folks signed up for a Zero Waste Dutchess at http://www.petitiononline.com/zeroyes -- and join 160+ of us on Facebook-- at "Zero Waste Dutchess"!]


###################################################


[recall below on this sent out last Tues. to this list-- letters to editor to local newspapers still needed]


re: "new" MSWC report-- new boss = old boss-- garbage in, garbage out; wake up, folks!...


You may have seen on http://www.MidHudsonNews.com the story from Hank Gross:"Consultant Releases Draft Executive Summary of Dutchess Waste Management"...


More to point here tho-- I have a copy of so-called "April 13th Draft Executive Summary" from Mid-Atlantic Solid Waste Consultants-- and it ain't pretty, folks-- let me know if you'd like copy; I'll email it to you!...


[letters to editor needed asap on all this here, folks!...zip 'em out now-- asap-- 250-word missives on all this to letterstoeditor@poughkeepsiejournal.com, letters@freemanonline.com, editorial@thehudsonvalleynews.com, newsplace.com-- you have NO idea how effective these are, k?]


[...also important-- after reading all this thru-- email all 25-- countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us!...]


[and-- see http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=205233122844070 -- re: Earth Day rally]


And so then-- without further ado-- six main "beefs" I have with the MSWC "Draft Executive Summary":


1. FIRST, pages 5 and 6 of this document state-- "It is our understanding that the County can, by passage of a resolution, re-assign the Planning Unit authority from the RRA back to the County. Because the Planning Unit sets the course for waste management in the County, the RRA would be obligated to support the direction set by the Planning Unit. Dutchess County should immediately take steps to designate itself as the Planning Unit if it wants to fully control its destiny."


[...and-- page 13 also again strongly recommends that the following be taken into consideration-- "that the County should pass a resolution to re-assign the Planning Unit status from the RRA to the appropriate organization within Dutchess County"(!)...]


Interesting, right?...recall-- just last month the GOP majority in our Co. Leg. shot down along party lines the Tyner/Doxsey resolution to do exactly this-- to publicly declare that the power to approve/reject the LSWMP belongs rightfully to our County Legislature, if we elected representatives are to take our responsibility seriously on this-- in spite of DEC website-- http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/71265.html -- as former Co. Leg. Attorney David Sears pointed out to us in his Feb. 20 letter to yours truly (see below)...


Important-- this jibes with what we heard at our Apr. 6th Vassar forum from DEC Region 3 Recycling Coordinator Theresa Laibach-- recall-- she publicly confirmed that ultimately it IS, in fact, well within the power and authority of the Dutchess County Legislature to approve or reject the Dutchess County Resource Recovery Agency's Local Solid Waste Management Plan(!)...[yes, Laibach said this publicly!]...


And-- recall as well-- as Co. Leg. Minority Leader Sandy Goldberg mentioned on the floor during the Apr. 7th Environmental Committee mtg., fact is that MSW Consultants have made it clear they're along about implementing the incredibly flawed Solid Waste Management Plan from DCRRA-- not really about changing it!...(see mtg. for yourself-- http://www.totalwebcasting.com/view/?id=dutchess )...


2. SECOND, page 14 of MSWC's "Draft Executive Summary" contains this statement pushing to actually expand incineration in our county, sadly (see below many reasons why not to do this!)-- ""It is also the professional opinion of MSW Consultants that the County can and should enforce existing flow control laws to bring the RRF [Resource Recovery Facility = incinerator] up to capacity from now until 2014."


This, of course, is an echo of what page 2 stated-- that "Specifically, the Dutchess County Resource Recovery Agency's Local Solid Waste Management Plan (LSWMP) calls for [among other things]:
-- upgrade one of the existing turbines and expanding the RRF [Resource Recovery Facility = incinerator] to add another 250-tons-per-day processing line to accomodate 100 percent of the County's disposed waste stream


-- implementation of a direct revenue mechanism to fund [among other things]...upgrade...the RRF [Resource Recovery Facility = incinerator]...and build reserves for future facilities and projects


-- considering the development of a new ash landfill"[!!!]


3. THIRD, page 6 states-- "In the opinion of MSWC, the decision of waste disposal is between retaining the waste-to-energy system that exists currently or converting to a waste export system." [false choice!!!]


This blithe assertion ignores these 3 key facts on how Dutchess could/should move towards zero waste:


Fact #1: Dutchess County now incinerates or sends to landfills $15 million worth of materials and resources that could be recycled, including plant debris, food waste, paper, wood, ceramics, soils, metals, glass, polymers, textiles, chemicals, and various items for reuse (Richard Anthony Associates).
[see: http://ccgovernment.carr.org/ccg/pubworks/sw-future/docs/resource-assessment.pdf MD like NYS!]

Fact #2: Ten times more jobs could be created by moving towards a zero-waste approach to resource recovery compared to incineration/landfilling, according to the Institute for Local Self-Reliance; locally this means 500 new jobs could be created right here in Dutchess County if those materials were recycled instead of burned or buried, according to the Institute for Local Self-Reliance/Rick Anthony.
[see: http://www.ilsr.org/recycling/recyclingmeansbusiness.html ]


Fact #3: The city of Springfield, Mass. has saved $75,000 in just the first half of this year alone by expanding recycling to one-third of the city; it expects to save $450,000 a year through greatly
expanded recycling. ["Springfield Municipal Recycling Initiative To Expand" (WAMC's Paul Tuthill 7/10)
http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wamc/news.newsmain/article/0/0/1679516/news/Municipal.Recycling.Initative.To.Expand ]


4. FOURTH, p. 13 states-- "It isn't unreasonable for Du. Co. to achieve a 50 to 60 percent recycling rate..."


This is pathetic-- and ignores how Nantucket is already at 92% recycling rate; San Francisco at 72% recycling rate; Los Angeles at 64% rate; King County (WA) at 62% rate-- the City of Novarro in Italy actually got to a 70% recycling rate in 18 months(!)...(even Shabazz got Beacon to 70% 20 years ago!).
[see: http://www.no-burn.org/why-incineration-is-a-very-bad-idea-in-the-twenty-first-century ]


Recall, too-- Clearwater, Sierra Club, NYPIRG, EANY, Citizens Environmental Coalition all agree; see http://www.CECToxic.org -- all those groups endorsed 85% recycling rate for Dutchess/NY by 2020!...
[that coalition-- NYS Zero-Waste Alliance-- knows "recycling saves 4x energy that incineration recovers!]


[...see: http://www.cectoxic.org/ZeroWastePlatform2010.html -- DCRRA only pushing for 20% by 2020...]


Fact: The Poughkeepsie Journal reported last March 7th that "the Dutchess County Resource Recovery Agency recycles only 4 percent of Dutchess' 250,000 tons of garbage; little is done to encourage
recycling in the county; when waste recycled by private haulers is included, the county recycling rate is only 11 percent, about half the state rate, agency figures show; an estimated 30,000 tons of
paper alone go to the trash heap yearly."
http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20100307/NEWS01/3070352/Critics-rip-agency-as-recycling-falters


5. FIFTH, MSWC's "Draft Executive Summary" ignores, for all intents/purposes, two environmental facts:


Fact: The Poughkeepsie Journal reported March 7th that emissions from our county incinerator of particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, and nitrogen oxide have all increased over the last
decade-- along with the fact that, on an annual basis, our county incinerator also creates 50,000 tons of toxic ash-- and spews 29 pounds of heavy metals (mercury/arsenic/lead/cadmium), 37 tons of sulfur dioxide, 22 tons of hydrogen chloride/hydrogen fluoride, and 3700 tons of carbon dioxide.
http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20100307/NEWS01/3070350/Burn-plants-seem-cleaner-but-facts-debated


Fact: Dutchess County incinerator in Poughkeepsie spews 3700 tons of carbon emissions yearly.
[ http://www.CARMA.org ; http://www.StopTrashingtheClimate.org ; recall http://www.350.org !]


6. SIXTH-- MSWC's "Draft Executive Summary", frankly, could have hit much harder-- these salient facts:


Fact: "The Dutchess County trash-burning plant needs millions from taxpayers to break even each year, costs 46 percent more to operate than 13 other plants in New York and Connecticut and has debts
stretching beyond all of them." [Poughkeepsie Journal 5/10/09]
http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20090510/NEWS01/905100344/Dutchess-County-Resource-Recovery-Agency-Inefficient-expensive-in-debt


Recall this, too, buried on p. 2 in the B (Mid-Hudson) section of Oct. 11th Poughkeepsie Journal from last year: "The DCRRA's deficit, the amount that must be shouldered by county taxpayers, rose from $850,000 a decade ago to more than $6 million last year."
http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20101011/REPOSITORY/10110335/Conners-quits-RRA-waste-plan-hearing-is-today


Fact: The cost of disposing of the Dutchess County Incinerator's 50,000 tons of toxic ash annually has doubled in recent years to three million dollars a year, according to Dutchess County Resource
Recovery Agency Board Chair William Conners in a statement he made in Co. Leg. chambers in 2010.
[see: http://www.no-burn.org/why-incineration-is-a-very-bad-idea-in-the-twenty-first-century P. Connett]


Again-- can't be emphasized enough...


Letters to editor needed asap on all this here, folks!...zip 'em out now-- asap-- 250-word missives on all this to letterstoeditor@poughkeepsiejournal.com, letters@freemanonline.com, editorial@thehudsonvalleynews.com, newsplace.com-- you have NO idea how effective these are, k?...


[...and-- also important-- after reading all this thru-- email all 25-- countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us!...]


Not outraged?...sorry, folks-- you're not payin' attention...


[...and if you've read the six "beefs" above and understand...and agree-- pass 'em on!...]


Joel
444-0599/876-2488
http://www.DutchessDemocracy.blogspot.com


##############################################


[recall below (last update) sent out on all this originally back on Apr. 8th]


Miccio's wrong-- DCRRA still bent on prolonging/expanding incineration; proof here....

Did anyone else out there find our County Legislature Environmental Chair Jim Miccio's statements during the Environmental Committee meeting last night curious?....(not outraged?...no attention)....


Miccio went out of his way over and over again to say Dutchess is not planning to prolong incineration...


Fact: (as I pointed out during the meeting but got shouted down, natch)-- the truth is that our county Resource Recovery Agency's own Solid Waste Management Plan proves throughout (on pages 5, 59, 76, 80, 84, 93, and 94) that the DCRRA is still quite bent on prolonging and expanding incineration.


[don't believe me?...see http://www.DCRRA.org/reports/LSWMP_12-4-10.pdf for yourself; scroll down]


Feel free to send a message to all of us at countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us asking why, folks!...


[go to http://www.totalwebcasting.com/view/?id=dutchess to view webcast of Miccio's idiot attacks]


[watch webcast closely-- you can hear Miccio telling me repeatedly "get your head out of your butt"...lol]


Sadly, GOP Co. Leg. majority on Environmental Committee last night shot down Dem caucus proposal drafted by yours truly declaring that our County Legislature DOES have the power to approve, reject, and/or amend our county's Solid Waste Management Plan!...(just as in every single other county in the state, according to DEC Region 3 Recycling Coordinator Terry Laibach-- and recall-- she even stated last night at our forum in Vassar that yes, the Dutchess County Legislature DOES have the right too)...


[see: #2011102-- http://www.co.dutchess.ny.us/CountyGov/Departments/Legislature/CLagenda.htm ]


As the worm turns...


p.s. As Co. Leg. Minority Leader Sandy Goldberg mentioned last night on the floor during the Environmental Committee mtg., fact is that MSW Consultants have made it clear they're along about implementing incredibly flawed Solid Waste Management Plan from DCRRA-- not really about change!


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


From http://www.DCRRA.org/reports/LSWMP_12-4-10.pdf ...(from DCRRA's own website)...


[read below, folks-- proof right here that DCRRA STILL bent on prolonging/expanding incineration!]


County of Dutchess
and
Dutchess County Resource Recovery Agency
LOCAL SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN

November 29, 2010
_______________________________________
Germano & Cahill, P.C. Gerhardt, LLC
Michael J. Cahill, Esq. Hans G. Arnold

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


From page 5...


"Optimize Waste-to-Energy - The Agency should commission a thorough study of the condition and life expectancy of the RRF in anticipation of a competitive procurement for a new contract
for operation of the RRF and possible capital improvements after the expiration of the
current operating agreement in June 2014."


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


From page 59...


"The current Service Agreement with Covanta Energy (which concluded a stock purchase of the assets of Montenay Dutchess in August 2009) will expire in June 2014, and prior to that date, the DCRRA
will have to procure a new operating contract for the Facility, through competitive
bidding under General Municipal Law §120-w. In preparation for that procurement, the
DCRRA should undertake a full engineering assessment of the condition of the Facility,
and prepare an estimate of the major components and equipment which will need
refurbishment or replacement to assure continued reliable operation for the ensuing 20
to 25 years. Such an assessment will allow the DCRRA to provide for capital
improvements when needed, and will provide prospective bidders for the post-2014
Service Agreement with technical information necessary to submit an informed
proposal."


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


From page 76...


"The following summarizes the basis for the projections in Table 13:

2010 the Resource Recovery Facility (RRF) [Dutchess County Incinerator] at 92% capacity


2015 the existing RRF at 100% capacity.

2020 the RRF expanded with a third boiler for a total capacity of 199,000 tons per year."


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


From page 80...


"The O'Connor rotary waterwall combustor is no longer being manufactured. However
replacement parts for continuous maintenance are available and have been obtained
without difficulty by the facility operator. A review of the performance and condition of
the RRF by HDR Engineers in 2007 found that with appropriate maintenance, the RRF
has a useful life expectancy of more than 20 years.

The O'Connor design has limitations in both power generation and combustion
efficiency when compared to other designs in use in the United States and in Europe.
As noted, the RRF has consistently provided approximately 315 KWh/ton of electric power for export. Other boiler designs in use today can combust larger quantities of MSW and generate up to 650 KWh/ton with optimal MSW feedstock in terms of BTU value and consistency."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


From page 84...


"The RRF has not been expanded as originally planned for, and continues to process
only about two-thirds of the non-recyclable fraction of the municipal waste stream.


In 2009 the Agency received 150,641 tons of MSW for processing at the RRF. This
means that approximately 99,359 tons of MSW generated in Dutchess County was
taken to disposal facilities outside the County for disposal.

Similarly, the MRF is undersized and processes only a portion of the County's recyclables...the Agency should consider an increase in the capacity of the RRF to reduce the amount of material transported to
distant landfills."


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


From page 93...

"In order to extend the useful life of the waste-to-energy facility through 2030 and
beyond, a detailed analysis of the facility and an estimate of the capital expenditures
that would be needed at various points over the next 20 years of operations in order to
continue satisfactory performance should be performed."


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


From page 94...


"Some immediate and long term improvements to the RRF can be made in
order to increase efficiency without increasing the Facility's current throughput.
Currently, WTE Facility expansions are being planned or constructed at Lee County,
Florida; Hillsborough County, Florida; Honolulu, Hawaii; York, Pennsylvania; Olmsted,
Minnesota; Hempstead, New York; Islip, New York and Harford County, Maryland. The
size and costs of these expansions vary. Comparisons of costs per ton of new capacity
reveal a wide range of variation, reflecting differences in design, site restrictions and
other local conditions. In general, the costs are significant. Examples are $193,000.00
per design ton at Lee County, Florida to $233,000.00 per design ton at Hillsborough
County Florida, both of which are approximately 700 tpd expansions currently under
construction. In New York, neither Covanta Energy Hempstead nor the Islip Resource
Recovery Agency has publicly announced costs for the expansions of their respective
facilities. Studies performed for the Montgomery-Otsego-Schoharie Solid Waste
Authority (MOSA) have estimated costs at $225,000.00 per design/ton. We have no
reason to believe that costs for an expansion of the Dutchess RRF would be different.
The absence of a local ash landfill owned by the DCRRA means that the County
continues to depend on competitive bids for the transport and disposal of ash residue at
landfills outside the County, and in fact, at significant distance from the County."


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[...and let's not forget this from page 95-- "Ideally, the County would have its own ash landfill. Although it might be equal in cost to the current cost of export, it would stabilize costs over the long term and eliminate the risk of price hikes due to fuel increases and a constriction in disposal capacity..."(!)...]


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[recall below sent out on all this yesterday morning]


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Recall this (originally posted to this list Feb. 20) from [former County Legislature Attorney]: David Sears


To: Joel Tyner joeltyner@earthlink.net

Joel, The County is the planning unit and even DEC Regs require the Legs approval and either a EIS for adoption or a negative declaration. This is clearly "cover" to continue to distance themselves from the mis-managed RRA.

From the NYSDEC's own website [see http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/71265.html ]

"LSWMP Formal Approval Process
This page describes some of the procedures involved in DEC approval of a Local Solid Waste Management Plan (LSWMP). More details on these procedures can be found in 6 NYCRR Section 360-15.10.

All LSWMPs must be submitted to DEC in draft for approval.

DEC reviews the draft LSWMP to determine whether it effectively addresses all matters required by 6 NYCRR 360-15.9

If it does not, DEC will specify the matters in which the draft LSWMP is deficient (review letter). The Draft LSWMP must be revised based on DEC comments. It is possible that more than one round of comments and revisions may occur to the LSWMP document.

Once DEC determines that the draft LSWMP is a substantive consideration of the elements in 360-15.9, DEC provides notice to the Local Planning Unit of its intent to approve the LSWMP. This notice is colloquially known as the "approvable letter".

DEC recommends that the Local Planning Unit conduct the Public Comment period after receipt of the "Approvable Letter" from DEC. This sequence serves to avoid the potential for needing two Public Comment Periods, once for the Draft and once for the Final LSWMP, if significant changes are made after DEC review. The same recommendation applies to the resolution from the Governing Board, described below.

The Approvable Letter indicates that the Local Planning Unit must submit to DEC:

A Final stand-alone LSWMP

A Resolution of adoption of the LSWMP from the Local Planning Unit's Legislative Board.

An EIS for the adoption of the LSWMP, SEQR findings statement --OR- negative declaration

Once DEC determines that the Final LSWMP, adopting resolution, and SEQR findings statement or Negative Declaration are complete and acceptable, DEC approves the LSWMP. This notice is colloquially known as the "Final Approval Letter."


The approved LSWMP becomes the LSWMP in effect for the Local Planning Unit."


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Thx tons to everyone who came out Apr. 6th to our Vassar & Rhinebeck zero-waste forums:


Expert speakers who presented to us last night:


-- Neil Seldman, Pres. of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance
-- Shabazz Jackson, Founder of Greenway Environmental Services (along with Josephine Papagni)
-- Barbara Warren, Exec. Dir. of Citizens Environmental Coalition and NYS Zero-Waste Alliance(!)
-- Nadine Souto of Vassar RePower(also there tonite-- Luke Leavitt and Ethan Buckner)


[thx also to Rhinebeck Village Boardmember Howie Traudt & Rhinebeck's Gary Kenton for comin' too!]


We're off to a great start-- check out everyone who signed on to our new 85% by 2020 recycling goal(!):


[referring to recycling rate for Dutchess/NYS-- Clearwater, Sierra Club, NYPIRG, EANY, CEC agree; see http://www.CECToxic.org all those groups have endorsed 85% recycling rate for Dutchess/NY by 2020!]


So-- without any further ado then-- new 85% by 2020 endorsers include the following:

-- Neil Seldman, President of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance
-- former Co. Leg. Bill McCabe
-- Norene Coller (former Dutchess County EMC Chair) and Dick Coller
-- Nadine Souto and Luke Leavitt of Vassar RePower
-- James Constantino of Millbrook (general counsel for Royal Carting!)
-- Ken and Janet Kraft of Poughkeepsie's Krafted Kup
-- Jolanda Jansen, P.E. of Poughkeepsie
-- Larry Freedman of Clinton
-- Todd Dutt and Jessica Bennett of Clinton
-- Judy Malstrom of Clinton
-- Marcia Slatkin of Rhinebeck
-- Cynthia Philip of Rhinebeck
-- Bob and Shirley Burroughs of Rhinebeck
-- John McDonald of Rhinebeck
-- Vane Lashua of Beacon
-- Bill Costine of Beacon
-- Sarah Womer of Beacon
-- Paul Kelly of Red Hook
-- Jillian Egan of Poughkeepsie
-- Stephanie LaRose of Poughkeepsie
-- Frank Van Zanten of Poughkeepsie
-- Ralph Pollard of Poughkeepsie
-- Earl Brown of Poughkeepsie
-- Carlos Leos of Poughkeepsie
-- Susan Randolph of Poughkeepsie
-- James Mezzando of Poughkeepsie
-- Michael Lavacca of Poughkeepsie
-- Laura Smith of Poughkeepsie
-- Mary Nisery of Poughkeepsie
-- Rich Carlson of Wappinger
-- Lisa Jones of Tivoli
-- Kit Stebbins and Matthew Wilk of Marist
-- Ellen Xie and Zoe Stern of Vassar


[note, too-- join Luke Leavitt, Nadine Souto, Ethan Buckner et. al. for weekly Vassar RePower Zero-Waste Working Group mtg.'s Mondays 7-8 pm in Vassar Library Seminar room (124 Raymond Ave, Poughkeepsie NY 12604); for more info contact (404) 291-9703 or luleavitt@vassar.edu!]




- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[again-- resolution here below we tried to pass last month; email countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us!]


Environment

Resolution No. 2011102

RE: DUTCHESS COUNTY LEGISLATURE DECLARES THAT IT HAS THE POWER TO APPROVE, REJECT, AND/OR AMEND THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR DUTCHESS COUNTY

Legislator TYNER, DOXSEY, GOLDBERG, KUFFNER, and WHITE offer the following and move its adoption:

WHEREAS, the Dutchess County Resource Recovery Agency has the highest per-ton processing cost of 14 trash-burning plants in the area at about 50% higher than average-- with high debt, increasing costs and no-bid contracts ; Dutchess County taxpayers' subsidy has more than doubled over the last decade, and

WHEREAS, Dutchess County's Solid Waste Management Plan was due at the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation at the end of last December, and

WHEREAS, unfortunately the Dutchess County Resource Recovery Agency's hired consultants Germano & Cahill have proposed a Solid Waste Management Plan that promotes extending and expanding incineration in Dutchess County indefinitely, and

WHEREAS, it is within the legal right of the Dutchess County Legislature to have the power to vote to approve, reject, and/or amend the Solid Waste Management Plan for Dutchess County; given all the problems at the Dutchess County Resource Recovery Agency, anything less than our County Legislature assuming this power is an abdication of the responsibility to properly manage solid waste in Dutchess County, and therefore be it

RESOLVED, that the Dutchess County Legislature has the power to approve, reject, and/or amend the Solid Waste Management Plan for Dutchess County, and be it further

RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to Dutchess County Executive William Steinhaus, Dutchess County Resource Recovery Agency Executive Director William Calogero, and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Region 3 Director Willie Janeway.




- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Recall.....


From Neil S.: "these are the zero waste/resource management plans ILSR has assisted with in the US.:
http://www.ci.austin.tx.us/sws/zerowaste_masterplan.htm -- zero waste plan Austin, TX
http://compostingconsultant.com/images2/hawaii-zero-waste-plan.pdf -- zero waste plan for Hawaii Co.
http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/Library/infoCycling/2001/Winter/DelNorte.htm -- zero DelNorte
http://www.ilsr.org/recycling/delaware-resource-management.pdf : Resource Management in Delaware.


[also see: http://www.ilsr.org/recycling/links.html ; http://www.ilsr.org/pubs/2010yearendreport.pdf ;
Neil S."Wasted Energy: Debunking Waste-to-Energy Scheme" http://www.emagazine.com/view/?4315 ]


Fact: Shabazz for years now has taken all of the food waste from Vassar, Marist, and SUNY New Paltz and mixed it with yard waste-- and just over the past year has gotten the GOP-led Poughkeepsie Town Board (and Dem Town Supervisor there Pat Myers) to vote unanimously to allow Shabazz to expand food-waste composting operation he's run for years at Vassar Farms to 70 acres on DeGarmo Rd.(!).
[this is clear example for Rhinebeck and all of our municipalities; organics make up half wastestream]


[see "Case for Composting" 3/22/10 Boston Globe http://www.greenchange.org/article.php?id=5692 !]


Fact: The woody waste and other yard waste (leaves/grass) sitting in piles at the Rhinebeck Town Dump (on Stone Church Rd.) is the PERFECT material that Shabazz has proven can be mixed with food waste to make valuable compost and biofiltration soils to spec!...(Shabazz and I have seen this).


[here in Dutchess, Royal Carting tried 177-home food-waste collection pilot program in Beacon]


[see below-- Massachusetts Municipal Association ( http://www.MMA.org ) Associate Editor Mitch Evich last May 5th ran an article about the successful curbside collection of food waste in the towns of Hamilton and Wenham-- referring to how "organic waste accounts for roughly 40 percent of the solid waste that the typical household generates (about 10-12 pounds out of 27 pounds per week)": savings!]


Recall the front-page article about Shabazz in the Poughkeepsie Journal April 3, 2008 on great food-waste composting operation in Poughkeepsie using materials from Vassar and Marist to produce extremely valuable compost in high demand at non-odor facility (Vassar Farm); see:
http://groups.google.com/group/planputnam/msg/bb0dd1fd8ca9441a ; http://greenwayny.com/beta/about/?id=bio ; http://www.recycle.net/trade/aa945288.html ;
http://www.grn.com/trade/aa945288.html ; http://nysawg.org/news.php?id=40 .


Remember, too-- even back in '09 I succeeded in convincing Northern Dutchess Hospital, Baptist Home at Brookmeade, and folks from Fairgrounds and the Rhinebeck Central School District to all endorse the notion of moving Rhinebeck towards zero waste-- saving $$$ with food waste collection (remember Northern Dutchess News article on all this from summer of '09; other local media ignored this-- why?)...
[see: http://www.elementalimpact.org/ZWZDowntownAtlanta -- Atlanta is great example for Dutchess; many restaurants, entertainment and convention centers there saving money separating food waste!]


The City of Toronto has proven for years now that it actually saves tax dollars to have businesses and homeowners separate their food waste for weekly curbside collection-- because now, as a result of this, they only have to have their garbage collected once every other week(!)...why can't we do this here?...
[see: http://www.toronto.ca/greenbin/card.htm ]


Fact: Incinerator folks don't even want food waste; it's highly inefficient to burn (over 70% water; see http://www.Cool2012.com ).


Fact: Ithaca, Portland, Seattle, Boulder, Cambridge, and communities across Vermont, North Carolina, Minnesota, Michigan, California have smartly moved towards zero waste with food-waste composting
[ http://www.cool2012.com/community/collection/ http://www.jgpress.com/archives/_free/000525.html ;
http://www.recycletompkins.org/editorstree/view/177 ; http://ccetompkins.org/compost/index.html ]


Note-- thanks to Rhinebeck residents Marcia Slatkin, Dan Maciejac, Paul Antonell, Margaret De Wys, Vivian Mandala, Nicholas O'Connor, Michael West, and Chris Winham for bein' part of the 86 folks signed on to my http://www.petitiononline.com/zeroyes effort-- to make sure that recycling receptacless are placed next to all garbage bins in county-- help launch http://www.petitiononline.com/rbckrecy too;
how long will it be before brown metal garbage baskets in village have recycling containers near 'em?...


[note: Village of Millbrook has recycling containers next to all its garbage receptacles on the sidewalks-- why can't we do this in Rhinebeck, all over?...see: http://www.virtualhudsonvalley.com/events/?p=141 ]




- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[recall below originally sent out to this list Feb. 20th on all this]


re: RRA GOP Co. Leg. capitulates to Steinhaus; "new" SWMP to be same as old SWMP!...


Recently I attended the latest meeting of the so-called "Resource Recovery Reform" Committee in our County Legislature, with John Culverton and Rich Schlauder of Mid-Atlantic Solid Waste Consultants (MSWC) there updating us all on their work...

Crucial-- Culverton and Schlauder told us recently that MSWC "is not doing a parallel plan; not recreating; just expanding with details Resource Recovery Agency's Solid Waste Management Plan(!)...

[read that one over again, folks!!!]

Yep-- 'tis true-- Culverton and Schlauder assured us their (RRA's) plans would be for a so-called "user fee" or "service charge"-- "a logical formula that assumes roughly what they [each property in the county] generate"...

Wake up, folks-- this is the property tax Akeley/Steinhaus proposed two years ago to fund RRA waste!...

[...and-- just as important-- is NOT PAYT-- "user fee" would bear NO relation to how much you recycle!]

Why are Co. Leg. GOP capitulating to Steinhaus/RRA on all this?...methinx it just might be, among other things, fact that Steinhaus made MSWC wait weeks to receive signed contract-- tho funds donated from Dyson Foundation last year-- note, too-- $30,000 is still left from $90,000 donated from Dyson-- we need help from you all in grass roots to push for at least SOME of that $30,000 to be spent on a zero-waste expert like Neil Seldman of http://www.ILSR.org !...

[...of course legalized kickbacks for years from Royal Carting, HDR Engineering not pertinent-- not!...]

[see/sign http://www.petitiononline.com/cleangov for much much more re: legalized kickbacks in county]

Wake up, folks-- email all 25 of us NOW-- at countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us on all this...

86 Dutchess folks signed on so far to our http://www.petitiononline.com/zeroyes -- we need you active!...

Note as well-- Culverton/Schlauder also, incredibly, stated at this last meeting that "you [Dutchess County] have to have something-- whether it's an incinerator or a landfill" (a false choice)-- and falsely
asserted to us as well that "there are costs to expanding recycling"(!)...

[letters to editor needed too-- to letterstoeditor@poughkeepsiejournal.com, letters@freemanonline.com, newsplace@aol.com, editorial@thehudsonvalleynews.com!]

Recall this article from Poughkeepsie Journal Oct. 18th 2009 re: GOP for new property tax for $ for RRA:

"The Journal's findings come at a critical juncture for the management of trash in Dutchess. A task force appointed by the Democrat-controlled county Legislature concluded recently that the Dutchess County Resource Recovery Agency was mismanaged and said its multi-million-dollar annual subsidy-- and possibly the trash agency itself-- should be eliminated.

The agency countered with its own report advocating a new property tax to support operations, an expanded burn plant, and most significantly, the adoption of a "flow control" law that would put the agency in charge of all 250,000 tons of waste produced in the county, in addition to the 150,000 tons processed at the burn plant."

[from "No License? No Problem for Trash Haulers; County Enforcement Lax" by Mary Beth Pfeiffer]

...but that's not all folks...(scroll down just a bit for much, much more on this!)....

This past Monday (Feb. 14th) learned after meeting with former Dutchess County Legislature Attorney David Sears that, contrary to Co. Leg. Chair Rolison's statements to the contrary at the end of last Thursday, the fact is that even the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation's own website clearly states that it is necessary for the Dutchess County Legislature to approve the Solid Waste Management Plan for Dutchess County(!)...(kudos to Minority Leader Goldberg for leading line of questioning on this last week)...

See below-- specifically, the DEC website itself states that "A Resolution of adoption of the LSWMP [Local Solid Waste Management Plan] from the Local Planning Unit's Legislative Board [County Legislature]"(!)...

But again-- more re: above-- recall this one as well-- from Poughkeepsie Journal Nov. 14, 2009:

[more from PoJo on GOP drive for years now for new property tax ("green fee") to subsidize RRA waste]

"Steinhaus Proposes Solid Waste User Fee"

Under a plan by Dutchess County Executive William Steinhaus, businesses and homeowners would be charged a new solid waste user fee to help pay for the operating costs of the county Resource Recovery Agency he defunded in his 2010 budget proposal.

Steinhaus left it to the Legislature to set the fee. The solid waste user fee would replace the annual net service fee the county pays to the agency out of its budget, acting Solid Waste Management Commissioner Roger Akeley said in a memo to legislators.

Residential units would pay a standard fee per household unit, while property owners who generate more waste would pay a higher fee per square foot based on the volume of waste generated, Akeley said. Vacant properties that don't have waste would not be charged.

Legislator Joel Tyner, D-Clinton, who headed the Green Ribbon Task Force on Solid Waste Management, had concerns about the user fee.

"I'm afraid homeowners and taxpayers are going to be forced to subsidize the waste at the Resource Recovery Agency without the real problem being solved," Tyner said.

Tyner cited Poughkeepsie Journal investigations that documented the agency has the highest per-ton processing cost of 14 trash-burning plants in the region, at 46 percent higher than the average. An ongoing Journal investigation has found heavy debt, higher costs and no-bid contracts at the agency.
Steinhaus' proposal did not specify the amount of the fee. But in his 2010 budget plan he did not fund the agency, which had sought $6.3 million for next year. The subsidy has grown 250 percent since 2001.


Again-- check out this startling info I posted 2/14 to http://www.DutchessDemocracy.blogspot.com :

This past Monday (Feb. 14th) learned after meeting with former Dutchess County Legislature Attorney David Sears that, contrary to Co. Leg. Chair Rolison's statements to the contrary at the end of last Thursday, the fact is that even the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation's own website clearly states that it is necessary for the Dutchess County Legislature to approve the Solid Waste Management Plan for Dutchess County(!)...(kudos to Minority Leader Goldberg for leading line of questioning on this last week)...

See below-- specifically, the DEC website itself states that "A Resolution of adoption of the LSWMP [Local Solid Waste Management Plan] from the Local Planning Unit's Legislative Board [County Legislature]"(!)...

Fact: This is completely contrary to Co. Leg. Chair Rolison's statements at end of last Thursday's County Legislature Environmental Committee meeting (Feb. 10th).

[go to http://www.totalwebcasting.com/view/?id=dutchess to view webcast of this for yourself!]


Note: Interestingly enough, just a few years ago when there was a Democratic majority in our County Legislature, Rolison himself was invited to meet with DEC officials, along with Dems like Roger Higgins, Fred Knapp, et. al.; strangely enough, a number of meetings with the DEC seem to have taken place with no representation whatsoever from the Democratic Caucus of our County Legislature...

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

update re: Eleanor Roosevelt Human Rights Wall of Truth for Dutchess-- help make it happen!...

Hi all..


Nine more reasons here to help contribute to our new Eleanor Roosevelt Human Rights Wall of Truth for Dutchess(!).......[time runnin' out-- we need to put this together by May Day rally this Sunday, folks!]...

[again-- thx to folks like Steven Meddaugh and Tijaun Johnson of Poughkeepsie High School and Moises Rivera, Angela Gutierrez and Tim McCormick of Vassar's MEChA, more and more of you have come forward to indicate your interest in helping-- we'll be displaying our Eleanor Wall at massive May 1st rally for immigrant rights in Pok.!]

1. 5/16/05 Dutchess County Human Rights Commission meeting minutes-- "M. Vetrano reported on an attack that occurred against a black NYS Corrections Officer and her son by white fellow Corrections Officers at a party outside of work. The black Corrections Officer's son was arrested; however, the white Corrections Officers who attacked him were not. M.Vetrano reported on a housing issue related to a tenant with a disability living in the City of Poughkeepsie. M. Vetrano reported to the Commission on a complaint against a school district alleging sexual harassment and retaliation against an employee."


2. 8/15/05 Dutchess County Human Rights Commission meeting minutes-- "Commissioner Sharone Wellington-deAnda brought to the Commission's attention that an employer in Dutchess County may be discriminating in terminating minority employees for the same or similar incidents, as white employees. Ms. Vetrano advised that she had some information and complaints regarding this employer and had some referrals from the NAACP regarding the same employer. John Johnson, a City of Beacon resident, met with and took his concerns regarding seniors to the City of Beacon Commission. He expressed his concerns regarding how seniors are treated by Section 8 and Public Housing officials, that there are little to no programs, and things for youths to do."


3. 9/20/04 Dutchess County Human Rights Commission meeting minutes-- "Chair Dazell Green reported on an issue with City of Poughkeepsie Pop Warner Football. It has come to his attention that the President of the Town of Poughkeepsie Pop Warner Football has been illegally recruiting affluent white players who live in the City of Poughkeepsie to play for the Town of Poughkeepsie, so that they do not have to play with black players."


4. 11/21/05 Dutchess County Human Rights Commission meeting minutes-- "Co. Leg. Sandy Goldberg brought to the Commission's attention that the last issue of the publication known as 'The Hornet' distributed throughout Wappingers Falls had articles that were anti-Semitic."


5. 6/21/10 Dutchess County Human Rights Commission meeting minutes-- "There is a belief that there is a rift between the Blacks and Hispanic Mexicans...there are questions concerning some minority businesses being treated fairly as they are unable to or find it difficult to get approvals from the City of Poughkeepsie Planning District."


6. 10/18/04 Dutchess County Human Rights Commission meeting minutes-- "Randy Ross reported on an issue in the Pawling School District in which students of the Muslim faith observing Ramadan requested to be allowed not to go to the cafeteria during lunchtime and were advised they could stay in the Principal's office instead. They were not punished, but this gives the impression to those coming into the office that the students are being punished. Community member Ramayana Jones addressed the Commission regarding a BOCES meeting he attended in which seven Adult Education teacher positions were eliminated as a result of budget cuts...the BOCES Transitions program has found/placed 67 individuals in jobs since July 1, 2004."


7. 9/20/10 Dutchess County Human Rights Commission meeting minutes-- "Bill Quinn of Taconic Resources for Independence brings before the Commission his concerns re: bus route changes, affecting those needing ADA service; an 8/27/10 article is discussed regarding burglaries in the Town of Poughkeepsie, targeting Asians; in Fishkill, hate-crime-type graffiti written on walls; an employment complaint is brought forward regarding a Hispanic social worker in a local school district"


8. 7/19/10 Dutchess County Human Rights Commission meeting minutes-- "Concerns are brought forward by a mosque in Poughkeepsie regarding 'no parking' signs up now for 9 am to noon in area."


9. 9/21/09 Dutchess County Human Rights Commission meeting minutes-- "Programs proven workable in other communities were discussed; Kingston has a Boys and Girls Club; Cincinnati has also found a way to reduce gun violence dramatically."


And-- in case you missed my "Valley Views" op-ed piece in Pok. Journal Apr. 5 ("Make County Better"):


"4. Help us with our Eleanor Roosevelt Human Rights Wall of Truth for Dutchess. Every year for the past decade there have been more than 600 (often 900) different complaints, inquiries and requests for information made to our county's just-killed-by-GOP Human Rights Commission from African-Americans, Latinos, women, seniors, the differently abled, LGBT community - share your experience with discrimination."


[that was the fourth way I listed as far as different initiatives I'm working on now; click here for op-ed:
http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20110405/OPINION/104050305/Valley-Views-Four-ways-make-county-better ]


Pass it on...

Joel
444-0599/876-2488
joeltyner@earthlink.net

p.s. Thx tons to PHS' Steven Meddaugh for already successfully securing a funding commitment of $200 for this from Vassar's MEChA (Chicano student movement there)-- need YOUR help now!...(and-- thx also to Wesley Lee and Ann Perry for their generous gifts to us to get this off the ground already as well!)...


[...and again-- kudos big-time to Steven M. for setting up "Human Rights Wall of Truth" on Facebook too; see:
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/home.php?sk=group_177752672274091 !...]


###############################################


[recall below sent out on this originally Mar. 27th]


An Eleanor Roosevelt Human Rights Wall of Truth for Dutchess-- help make it happen!...


Earlier this afternoon I broached an idea at Vassar's Grassroots Alliance for Alternative Politics confab:


An Eleanor Roosevelt Human Rights Wall of Truth for Dutchess County-- with anonymous (or with names) vignettes/stories/quotes of racial, sexual, other discrimination locally here in new millennium...


Quite a few folks piped up that they, indeed, were real interested in making such a wall reality!...


[a moveable wall-- hopefully to be of canvas or paper-- to be presented, perhaps, after it's filled up with stories from across Dutchess-- at the Mon. May 9th 7 pm full board meeting of our County Legislature]


[if we can't pull together to do this in Dutchess, land of Eleanor Roosevelt-- we should hang heads low;
of course would love to work with ERVK on this if they're interested; never too late to TRULY stand up]


So-- if you'd like to help work with us to pull this off and actually bring this to fruition-- let us know!...


[recall insult to injury-- wasn't just Dutchess Co. Leg. GOP that killed DCHRC-- but PoJo too; see below]


Pass it on-- for Eleanor-- and for all of us not yet co-opted by the power structure here in Dutchess...

###############################################


[on that note-- recall below re: DCHRC originally sent out to this list Feb. 13th]


PoJo cover-up for GOP again-- Feb. 13th editorial-- "OK" to kill Human Rights Commission(!)....


Just when you think the Poughkeepsie Journal can't sink any lower than it has already-- it does again...


To wit-- the Feb. 13th editorial covered up for Steinhaus, Rolison, Co. Leg. GOP-- telling us it's just fine and dandy that Dutchess doesn't have Human Rights Commission any more (after three decades)...(!)...


[send your 250-word letters of outrage in, folks-- to letterstoeditor@poughkeepsiejournal.com!]


Fact: Both Ku Klux Klan AND cross burnings have been here in Dutchess County over past 2 decades.


[racism is alive and well in new millennium, folks; see Tim Wise posted to RedRoom.com last July 10th:
http://www.redroom.com/blog/tim-wise/black-powers-gonna-get-you-sucka-right-wing-paranoia-and-rhetoric-modern-racism ]


Fact: Complaints, inquiries, and info requests to our county's Human Rights Commission since 2000:


[from African-Americans, Latino immigrants, women, seniors, differently abled, and gays and lesbians]


2009-- 926 (less than '08 only because DCHRC was unable to process calls for 45 days; budget cuts)


2008-- 971 different complaints, inquiries, and info requests to our county's Human Rights Commission


2007-- 860 different complaints, inquiries, and info requests to our county's Human Rights Commission


2006-- 817 different complaints, inquiries, and info requests to our county's Human Rights Commission


2005-- 676 different complaints, inquiries, and info requests to our county's Human Rights Commission


2004-- 711 different complaints, inquiries, and info requests to our county's Human Rights Commission


2003-- 768 different complaints, inquiries, and info requests to our county's Human Rights Commission


2002-- 768 different complaints, inquiries, and info requests to our county's Human Rights Commission


2001-- 789 different complaints, inquiries, and info requests to our county's Human Rights Commission


2000-- 800 different complaints, inquiries, and info requests to our county's Human Rights Commission


[note as well-- our county's Human Rights Commission has also received dozens of complaints about various police departments and our criminal justice system over the past two years alone; the fact is that two GOP county legislators have served for quite a long time as police officers locally-- coincidence?...recall: our county's Human Rights Commission looked into Beacon's Police Department]




Recall this Jan. 4th letter to editor from http://www.PoughkeepsieJournal.com -- more proof racism alive:


Letters to the editor for 1/4/11


JANUARY 4, 2011


Profiling By Police Must Be Stopped


As I complete a decade of residency in Poughquag, my wish is for my family and I to finally feel like residents. This will only be possible when Fishkill law enforcement and New York state police discontinue their racial profiling.


Innumerable, unwarranted and, mostly unpleasant, encounters over the last nine years with both have been endured by my husband and I.

I do not think we are the only ones. I am quite familiar with this area, having attended Vassar College 30 years ago. This is not the Dutchess County I recall and it will not be the Dutchess County I continue to tolerate. I encourage others who have had similar experiences to speak out. Separate rules do not apply to upstate. My quality of life and that of my family will not be arbitrarily degraded because of haughtiness and ignorance. And please, let's not address this solution with another mass training program. This is about improving the hiring and selection process. A cops-and-robbers mentality is for children, not law enforcement "professionals."

Dr. S. T. Smikle
Poughquag




Recall this one from http://www.NYPost.com back in January (also made it to WAMC; not to PoJo tho)...
Race relations a study in black & white
By BRENDAN SCOTT
Last Updated: 3:19 AM, January 18, 2011
Posted: 1:12 AM, January 18, 2011
Opinions about race are softening among white New Yorkers but not among blacks, says a statewide Siena College poll released yesterday...while 60 percent of whites expressed a generally positive view, blacks were nearly the reverse: 63 percent negative-- and the black perspective was virtually unchanged from last year's.




[recall, too-- not one GOP county legislator was willing to explain why they were so bent on killing our county's only Human Rights Commission after decades of service to Dutchess residents (I thought that was particularly cowardly-- their unwillingness to make any public statement whatsoever explaining their actions on this; shouldn't legislators be held publicly accountable and responsible for their actions?)...see http://www.totalwebcasting.com/view/?id=dutchess ; view webcast of Dec. Co. Leg. mtg.]


Fact: Just over the last five years the GOP majority in our County Legislature has targeted youth of color and Latino immigrants for racist scapegoating with the GOP's mailings and statements (re: GOP literature mailed out across Dutchess in 2005 against a bail loan fund-- and re: GOP statements against allowing undocumented workers to have driver's licenses).


Fact: Gay teenagers all over the U.S. are committing suicide due to teasing and bullying comments (and plenty of this still goes on in our schools here in Dutchess; I know this because I work in them).


[check out http://www.PoJoWatch.blogspot.com for more continued Pok. Journal bias]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[check out this must-read from Tim Wise posted to RedRoom.com July 10th this year-- from
http://www.redroom.com/blog/tim-wise/black-powers-gonna-get-you-sucka-right-wing-paranoia-and-rhetoric-modern-racism ]


Black Power's Gonna Get You Sucka: Right-Wing Paranoia and the Rhetoric of Modern Racism


Colorblind: The Rise of Post-Racial Politics and the Retreat from Racial Equity
by Tim Wise

by Tim Wise
July 11, 2010, 7:00 pm

Prominent white conservatives are angry about racism.

Forget all that talk about a post-racial society. They know better than to believe in such a thing, and they're hopping mad.

What is it that woke them up finally, after all these years of denial, during which they insisted that racism was a thing of the past?

Was it the research indicating that job applicants with white sounding names have a 50 percent better chance of being called back for an interview than their counterparts with black-sounding names, even when all qualifications are the same?

No.

Was it the study that found white job applicants with criminal records have a better chance of being called back for an interview than black applicants without one, even when all the qualifications are the same?

No.

Was it the massive national study that estimated at least 1 million cases of blatant job discrimination against blacks, Latinos and Asian Americans each year, affecting roughly one-in-three job seekers of color?

No.

Is it the fact that black males with college degrees are almost twice as likely as their white male counterparts to be out of work?

No.

Is it the data indicating that Chinese-American professionals earn less than 60 percent as much as their white counterparts, even though the Chinese Americans, on average, have more education?

No.


Was it the study that found the lightest-skinned immigrants to the United States make as much as 15 percent more than the darkest, even when the immigrants in question have the same level of education, experience and measured productivity?

No.

Perhaps they finally stumbled upon the evidence suggesting millions of cases of race-based housing discrimination against people of color each year, and this is what has them so incensed?

No.

Or maybe their anger is due to the reports of blatant racism practiced by Wells Fargo, which was deliberately roping black borrowers (to whom they referred as "mud people") into high-cost loans, targeting them for these instruments, and even falsifying credit histories to make black applicants look like greater risks than they were, so as to justify the scam?

No.


Was it the study demonstrating that e-mail inquiries about rental property submitted by people with white sounding names were 60 percent more likely than those with black sounding names to get a positive response from a landlord (meaning an indication that a unit was available for rent), even when the housing had been previously advertised as available?

No.

Maybe they're furious because of the way whites in the New Orleans area conspired after the flooding of the city to keep blacks from returning and being able to find housing on equitable terms, if at all?

No.

Or maybe it's because of the data from the Justice Department, to the effect that blacks are far more likely than whites to have their cars and persons searched after a traffic stop, even though whites, when searched, are more than four times as likely to have drugs or other illegal contraband on us?

No.

Well then, perhaps it's the recent revelations that police in New York City are blatantly profiling blacks and Latinos, stopping and frisking them in massive numbers, even though in 90 percent of all cases, the people they stop are released without any charge because they are found to have done nothing illegal?

No.


Is the source of their anger the data showing that although whites and blacks use and sell drugs at roughly the same rates, African Americans are anywhere from 2.8 to 5.5 times more likely than whites to be arrested for a drug offense, depending on the year?


Or perhaps the state level data indicating that in nine states, blacks are arrested at more than seven times the rate of whites, and in Minnesota and Iowa at rates that are more than eleven times greater than white arrest rates for drugs? Or perhaps the additional data that blacks are more than 10 times as likely as whites to be sent to prison for drug offenses, despite relatively equivalent rates of drug crimes? Or the fact that a majority of persons admitted to prison for drug offenses are black, even though there are about six times more white users nationwide?

No.

Maybe they're beside themselves over the fact that millions of black men who are ex-felons and have paid their debt to society are permanently blocked from voting thanks to disenfranchisement laws that were devised for blatantly racist reasons? Surely they are upset that these laws have led to blacks being denied the right to vote after serving their time at a rate that is 7 times the national average?

No.

Perhaps they're enraged by the way white police officers conspired to murder a black man in New Orleans after Katrina, and then cover up the crime, or the way other whites formed a vigilante terror squad and went hunting for black people in the aftermath of the flooding?

No.

Maybe it was that racist e-mail sent by the white Boston police officer to the reporter at the Boston Globe, in which he called Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates a "banana eatin' jungle monkey?"

No.

Then maybe it was the story about that high ranking racist in the Chicago police force who OK'd the torture of black men to extract confessions for years?

No.


Then I bet they must have finally seen that story about the Philadelphia cop who refers to black folks as animals and n-----s. That's it, right?

No.


Could it be that they've read and been moved by the dozens of studies that show the cumulative health effects of racism and discrimination on people of color, and which indicate that doctors do indeed treat patients of color differently, and worse, than their white counterparts? Or perhaps the research that finds how even black women with college degrees, decent jobs and good incomes have infant mortality rates for their children that are higher than the rates for white women who dropped out before high school? And the way that researchers believe stresses associated with racial discrimination are implicated in the worse fetal and neo-natal health of these mother's children?

No.

Perhaps it's the research that shows black students being suspended and expelled from school at far higher rates than white students, even though there are no significant differences in the rates at which students of different races violate serious school rules?

No.

Maybe it's the research indicating that teachers set lowered expectations for children with black-sounding names, independent of observed ability, and even when compared to the child's own siblings who have less identifiably black names. These lowered expectations, based on presumptions of lowered competence and ability then result in lower performance by the stigmatized students.

No.

Or maybe it was that troubling story on CNN about how white children and even many children of color seem to prefer white skin, and think that children with black skin are bad, dirty, mean and ugly?

No.


Well then it must be the blatant stuff. Maybe they finally got around to looking at those images of Tea Party protesters and other assorted conservatives coming to rallies with signs advocating the lynching of Democratic party leaders, or portraying the President as an African witch doctor? Or maybe somebody informed them of all the times that conservative and Republican Party activists have sent around blatantly racist e-mails lately, like those portraying the white house lawn covered in watermelons, or once again with the witch doctor imagery, or likening Michelle Obama to an ape, or picturing the President as a pair of "spook eyes" against a black background?

No.

Maybe they're angry at Tea Party leader Mark Williams for calling the President an "Indonesian Muslim" and a "welfare thug?" I mean, that's pretty racialized rhetoric, right?

No.

Or maybe it was the Tea Party leader in Ohio who tweeted about how he wants to shoot Hispanic immigrants, to whom he refers as "spicks?" (sic)

No.

Well then surely it must have been the story about Tea Party candidate for Governor in New York who sent e-mails picturing the President dressed as a pimp and featuring a group of African tribesman performing a traditional dance, which he referred to as the "Obama Inauguration Rehearsal?"

No.

Perhaps what has them angry is the statement by that Arizona Congressman, to the effect that black folks were better off under slavery than they are today?

No.

Maybe it was because of those guys over at the popular right-wing website, FreeRepublic.com who called the President's daughter, Malia, "typical ghetto trash," and a "whore" whose mother likes to entertain her by "making monkey sounds?"

No.


Or perhaps they finally had enough when they heard about how Rep. Ciro Rodriguez was called a "wetback" by one of his constituents and told to go back to Mexico?

No.

Or maybe it was that lawmaker in South Carolina who called both President Obama and Republican Gubernatorial candidate (and Indian American) Nikki Haley, "ragheads?"

No.

Or perhaps they're upset about how the guy who sponsored the law in Arizona, ostensibly to catch "illegal immigrants" (a law they support), turns out to be pals with neo-Nazis? Or the fact that the organization that takes credit for writing the bill has longstanding ties to blatant racists and hate groups?

No.

Or maybe it was the story about how National Review columnist John Derbyshire told Harvard law students that black achievement lags behind white achievement because blacks are biologically inferior to whites?

No.

Well perhaps it was that story about the motorists in Prescott, Arizona who continually shouted racial slurs at artists who were painting a mural on the walls of a school, which featured children of color who go there? And certainly they must have been upset about the fact that initially the school was actually planning to lighten the subjects' skin color so as to appease locals and a right wing talk show host?


No.

Or maybe they're irate because of the report that employees of the Department of Homeland Security have posted blatantly racist comments about Latino immigrants on web boards?

No.

Surely it must be because of the evidence that uniformed American soldiers are joining up with neo-Nazi organizations and even flaunting their membership in such groups?

No.

It is none of this. Neither the evidence of systemic discrimination against people of color in every walk of American life, nor the repeated examples of blatant racism directed towards people of color individually moves them.

But they're angry nonetheless about racism in America.

They're especially angry about the tax being placed on those who use tanning salons. Because this is racist. Against white people. No, seriously.

Oh, and the President criticized a white police officer for arresting a black man for a crime that, turns out, the black man didn't actually commit, according to state law. That Obama would do such a thing--namely, criticize an officer for making an unjustified arrest--means that white police officers are "under assault" from Obama, and that the President is trying to "destroy" the white officer, no doubt because he's white.


Oh, and since people of color disproportionately lack health care coverage, the President's plan for expanding coverage is obviously a racist scheme to get reparations for slavery.

Oh, and the President is deliberately trying to destroy the economy so as to pay back white people for slavery and hundreds of years of oppression.

Oh, and two black kids beat up a white kid on a bus in Belleville, Illinois--something that is obviously due to Obama being President.

Oh, and the President picked Eric Holder as Attorney General. Since Holder has said Americans have often been "cowards" when it comes to discussing race, this proves that Holder is racist against white people, even though he didn't mention white people. He said Americans, and Americans means white people. So he's a bigot. And so is Obama for picking him.

Oh, and the President nominated Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court. And she's a Latina, who notes that she sees the world through the lens of her experience, and that she hopes that experience would positively inform her decision-making. And that means she's a bigot. And the fact that Obama nominated her, as well as Eric Holder, proves that he "views white men as the problem" in America, and that the only way you can get promoted by Obama is "by hating white people." Like Tim Geithner, who most definitely hates your honky ass.

Oh, and the President also nominated Elena Kagan, and Kagan once worked for Justice Thurgood Marshall, and Marshall once said the Constitution as originally conceived--which, ya know, excluded blacks from citizenship--was flawed. Imagine. And this means that Marshall was anti-white, and anyone who worked for him must be too.


Oh, and the Obama Justice Department dropped criminal voter intimidation charges against three members of the New Black Panther Party in Philadelphia (while obtaining an injunction against a fourth member). So this proves the Administration is allied with the Panthers, whose Philly leader proclaims that he "hates all white people," and Obama probably agrees with him, and is refusing to prosecute because he doesn't care about white folks' voting rights. In fact, the New Black Panthers are part of Obama's "army of thugs." Even though the same Philly leader of the group didn't support Obama for President, and has called Obama a "puppet" and "slavemaster."


And of course, as a point of fact, the criminal charges against the other three Panthers were dropped by the Bush Department of Justice. And there have been no voters who actually claim to have been intimidated by the Panthers. And even a leading conservative Republican on the Civil Rights Commission says the incident is much ado about nothing.

Oh, and since the Justice Department is considering bringing federal charges against the white officer who killed Oscar Grant--a black man--in cold blood in Oakland last year, this proves that we've returned to the 1950s, only this time it's whites who are the victims of racist oppression. Because it's oppression to bring charges against a white cop who kills someone. Naturally.

Yes indeed, they all agree, Obama is a "reverse racist" who has a deep-seated hatred of white people, and who is like Hitler, and we know this because he's proposing a national service corps to help work on various community problems, and this is just like the Nazi SS, well, except for the murdering part. Or if not Hitler, then at the very least he's just like an "African colonial despot".

And for sure, Obama is the reason race relations are so strained: not because of the ongoing discrimination against people of color, which the data indicates is commonplace, or because of the incendiary rhetoric coming from conservative commentators. But because of Barack Obama.

Race relations could never be strained by say, for instance, having a white talk show host fantasize about murdering a black congressman with a shovel.

Or by another host calling undocumented migrants from Mexico "invasive species".
Or by spreading lies about how 5 million so-called "illegal aliens" were given subprime mortgages, as a way to blame the undocumented for the housing meltdown, even though there is no evidence whatsoever to support the fabricated claim.

Or by alleging that ACORN (a community-based organization comprised mostly of people of color) committed massive voter fraud so as to help elect Obama, even though there is no evidence that a single illegitimate vote was cast due to ACORN's voter registration efforts, and despite the fact that when a few ACORN operatives filed phony voter registration cards, it was ACORN itself that alerted election officials to the problem

Or by a prominent conservative commentator insisting that white men are experiencing the same kind of oppression that blacks faced for years, even as that commentator has previously reminisced fondly about the days of segregation.

Or by another radio host and prominent conservative author blaming "multicultural" people for "destroying" the country, or calling Arab Muslims "non-humans," or fantasizing about killing people in the "civil rights business."


Or by another radio host and prominent conservative author referring to the mostly black residents of New Orleans, in the wake of Katrina as "worthless parasites" and "human parasitic garbage" because of their high rates of welfare receipt. Even though, according to Census data, there were only 4600 households in all of the city receiving cash welfare at the time of the flooding, which was less than 4 percent of all black households in the city, and whose annual benefits came to only around $2800 per year.

Or by walking around with a sign suggesting that President Obama intends to put white people into slavery.

Or by saying that President Obama only won the election because he's black, and if he weren't black, he'd be a tour guide in Honolulu.

Or by saying that the only reason Colin Powell endorsed Obama was as an act of racial bonding.

Or by saying that Oprah Winfrey is also successful only because she's black.

Or by blaming the economic collapse on fair lending laws and lending to minorities, even though all the evidence suggests such laws and such loans had nothing to do with the housing or larger economic crises.

Or perhaps by having a right-wing talk show host announce a plan for conservatives to "take back the civil rights movement," and compare himself to Martin Luther King Jr. This, even though conservatives were almost uniformly opposed to the movement and King, and even though the talk show host's favorite authors, whose work he promotes regularly, viewed the movement as a communist conspiracy and referred to civil rights activists as animals.

Or by another conservative comparing himself to Dr. King, and speaking of how much he respects King's legacy, even as he--the conservative--has said he believes private businesses should have the right to discriminate on the basis of race.


No, none of those things could strain race relations, or further racism.

And certainly not when compared to a tanning booth tax.

While on the face of it, these kinds of right-wing inanities may seem so absurd as to hardly merit being taken seriously, it's important to step back and think about the internal logic of even the most outlandish claims. I mean, no one can honestly believe that health care reform is reparations. After all, what the hell kind of reparations is it where you have to get sick first in order to get paid? That's not a good hustle. And no one can really believe that some white kid got beat up on a bus because it's "Obama's America," as if the President had sent a text message to those black guys saying: HEY, YNOT BEAT SUM CRAKA ASS 4 ME, U DIG?


But the intellectual strength of the claims is not the issue. It doesn't matter. From a political perspective, even the most insane-sounding claim about Obama's supposed hatred for white people makes sense. It's a perfect way to prime white racial fears and anxieties, to say, in effect, they're coming for your money white folks, and then your children. In a nation where the population will be half people of color within 25-30 years, and where the popular culture is now thoroughly multicultural (and thus many of the icons don't look the way they used to), and where the President doesn't fit a lot of people's conception of what such a person is supposed to look like, and where the economy is in the toilet for millions, playing upon white anxiety is the perfect recipe for political mobilization.

They've said very clearly that they want their country back. And if we who oppose the right don't challenge these folks for the racists they are, or continue to shy away from making race an issue (as if it weren't already), they just might get it.

Tim Wise is the author of five books and over 250 essays on race. His latest is Colorblind: The Rise of Post-Racial Politics and the Retreat from Racial Equity (San Francisco: City Lights Books, 2010).