Thursday, December 31, 2009

stop gas drilling in NYS; today last day for DEC public comment!...

Hi all...

Today is the last day for public comment on the DEC's guide to oversee natural gas drilling in NYC-- scroll down just a bit for link and info from the good folks @ Environmental Advocates of NY on this; use their link to comment now!...

[Go to http://eany.convio.net/site/R?i=-50i_gP1zH7AlOQ6xLDMBQ.. to send your comments before it's too late and the comment period has closed-- today!!!]

860 folks in our region already signed on to my http://www.PetitionOnline.com/NoDrill -- sign on now if you haven't yet...

[...and-- don't forget toll-free number for Governor/NYS Legislators too-- (877) 255-9417!...(pass it on)]

[recall-- resolution on this passed overwhelmingly in our County Legislature earlier this month; see:
http://www.dutchessny.gov/CountyGov/Departments/Legislature/ResolutionsPDF/209388.pdf ]

[scroll down a bit to see humorous but infotaining update Jim Miller of http://www.BraveNewFilms.org !]

From my http://www.PetitionOnline.com/NoDrill ; http://www.petitiononline.com/airwater ...

"Enact Assemblymember Jim Brennan's proposed two-year moratorium legislation (formerly A.11527) on gas drilling in NY to protect groundwater from dangerous chemicals-- as the Sierra Club, Riverkeeper, Natural Resources Defense Council, Catskill Mountainkeeper, Delaware Riverkeeper Network, Catskill Center for Conservation and Development, The Wilderness Society, and Catskill Citizens for Safe Energy all called for in late July-- "a moratorium until all the comprehensives issues get looked at in their entirety”-- after the Governor’s office announced it had directed the DEC to prepare an updated generic environmental impact statement. According to Catskill Mountainkeeper, "The effects of drilling on the Catskill environment have the potential to be devastating. Carcinogens that accompany deep drilling also have the ability to penetrate our water supply-- a water supply that provides drinking water to NYC through aqueducts connected to the Catskill Watersheds. Perhaps the most devastating effects of drilling will be the endangerment of the natural beauty of this region, and the carbon emissions that come with the further use of fossil fuels.

Dr. Theo Colborn, author of "Our Stolen Future" has discussed the health impacts of gas drilling to humans, wildlife and domestic animals in areas of gas drilling. She has shared with listeners the truth behind the industry claim that they only use sand, water and soap in the drilling process. She has exposed the chemicals they actually use and the extreme heath dangers of these chemicals. Research has documented that 91% of these chemicals are hazardous to health as result of being skin and sensory organ toxicants, respiratory toxicants, gastrointestinal and liver toxicants, neurotoxicants, kidney toxicants, cardiovascular and blood toxicants, immunotoxicants, carcinogens, reproductive toxicants, wildlife toxicants, developmental toxicants and endocrine disruptors. Historically, these chemicals have not been properly handled, causing air and ground water pollution. As air and water are mobile-- this affects us all."
[see PetitionOnline.com/NoDrill; CatskillMountainkeeper.org;
Midhudsonnews.com/News/July08/29/gasdrill_mor-29Jul08.html;
www.assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=A11527]

From http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/10/watchdog_new_york_state_regulation_of ...

[my ol' buddy Walter Hang joined Amy Goodman on Democracy Now on all this Nov. 10th]

"The New York-based Toxics Targeting went through the Department of Environmental Conservation’s own database of hazardous substances spills over the past thirty years. They found 270 cases documenting fires, explosions, wastewater spills, well contamination and ecological damage related to gas drilling. Many of the cases remain unresolved. The findings are contrary to repeated government assurances that existing natural gas well regulations are sufficient to safeguard the environment and public health. The state is considering allowing for gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale watershed, the source of drinking water for 15 million people, including nine million New Yorkers."

Finally-- as long as you might get state legislator folks on the phone-- let both Dem and GOP state legislators know (along with Paterson) that they need to be http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/10/watchdog_new_york_state_regulation_ofputting much more time, energy, emphasis, and funding into great new energy initiatives like PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy loan program which allows municipalities all across NYS (even counties) to opt in)-- instead of gas-drilling!...

(see: http://www.r8ny.com/node/150010 ; Babylon, Berkeley, Boulder, Binghamton, many other communities have moved far ahead of us in Dutchess; join 31 other Dutchess folks signed on for this here-- at http://www.PetitionOnline.com/SOLAR ...and see http://www.LIGreenHomes.com for the miracle the Town of Babylon has been putting in place there-- exactly the type of program I've been raving about since early 2008, when I first learned of the similar miracle program put into place vis-a-vis http://www.CambridgeEnergyAlliance.org in Mass.; and started Independent Dutchess Energy Alliance:
see: http://dutchessdemocracy.blogspot.com/2009/03/our-bright-idea-growin-brighter-and.html !]

Joel
242-3571/876-2488
http://www.DutchessDemocracy.blogspot.com

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:00:18 -0500 (EST)

From: "Katherine Nadeau, Environmental Advocates of New York "

Subject: Last Call: Submit Your Comments to Protect New York from the Dangers of Natural Gas Drilling

Without strong rules and regulations-- and the staff to enforce them-- natural gas drilling could poison New York's drinking water.

New York is home to some of the cleanest drinking water in the country, but draft
rules that allow natural gas drilling near drinking water sources could poison our water and endanger our families.

Bowing to pressure from the natural gas industry, New York is poised to ram through a weak plan to oversee drilling that could contaminate our water, expose families around drilling sites to toxic chemicals, and destroy pristine landscapes in the Southern Tier and Catskills.

The public comment period ends on December 31st, so it's critical that you write today. Go to http://eany.convio.net/site/R?i=SNOXRvnghDXnGWJwNRX8IQ.. to protect New York's drinking water from natural gas drilling.

In other parts of the country, a drilling method called hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking" has poisoned wells and spilled toxic chemicals into waterways and across landscapes.

Now the natural gas industry is champing at the bit to drill in New York.

This fall, New York's Department of Environmental Conservation released a draft guide to oversee fracking. The draft contains many critical flaws:

* It doesn't protect our families from toxic chemicals used to drill wells.
* It doesn't safeguard against the withdrawal of the huge amounts of water required for drilling. Between 2 and 8 million gallons of water for each well.
* It doesn't include a big picture analysis of how natural gas drilling will impact our air, water, land and communities.
* It doesn't include regulations to protect New York's natural resources.
* Last but not least, regardless of what's in the guide, New York State doesn't have the manpower to oversee this booming industry.

The public comment period ends on December 31st. Go to http://eany.convio.net/site/R?i=-50i_gP1zH7AlOQ6xLDMBQ.. to send your comments before it's too late and the comment period has closed.

ACT NOW AND TELL YOUR FRIENDS! We need to protect New York's
precious drinking water from the dangers of industrial drilling.

Thank you.

Katherine Nadeau
Water & Natural Resources Program Associate
Environmental Advocates of New York

Go to http://eany.convio.net/site/CO?i=zZZfMYJ38g-_7aGCh6z36oTL-wRDgj6k&cid=0 to unsubscribe.

Powered By Convio
http://eany.convio.net/site/R?i=f2wfDuIIy2dAKwWxQuE42w..

Visit our web site
http://eany.convio.net/site/R?i=aQeK3MpqvezY6xA47YcPww..


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:03:54 -0500 (EST)


From: Jim Miller of Brave New Films


Subject: Tell Gov. Paterson: DO NOT GAS NY!








Tell Governor Paterson:
Do Not Gas NY!



ACT TODAY: Tell the Governor not to make New York's clean drinking water a holiday gift to the gas drilling industry



Top 10 reasons Governor Paterson should tell the DEC to withdraw the gas drilling rulemaking.


10. Because tapwater shouldn't be flammable.
9. Because Exxon isn't going to respect you after they Frack you.
8. Because Ithaca is still gorges.
7. Because if it's good for Halliburton, it's gotta be bad for us.
6. Because "clean natural gas" is neither clean nor natural.
5. Have you been to beautiful upstate Saudi Arabia lately?
4. Because toxic sludge isn't good for you.
3. Because a handful of fracking carpetbaggers shouldn't hold New York's drinking water hostage.
2. Because 230 toxic chemicals is not a cocktail I want to drink.
1. Because "I Love New York."

Our friends at Agit-Pop and Earthworks alerted us to an important issue in New York that we thought you should know about.

As you know, Brave New Films usually covers national issues but what may happen next year with the Marcellus Shale formation drilling in New York is irresponsible.

We are sending out this message on behalf of our friends, and as a native New Yorker I am asking you to:

Tell Governor Paterson: Do Not Gas NY!

You have until December 31st to let your voice be heard on this matter. This e-mail is only going to our NY supporters and it is important for the Governor to hear from his constituents about this matter.

The NY Department of Environmental Conservation is poised to adopt a rule that WILL NOT protect NY's surface and groundwater from gas drillers. Real protection is needed so that NY's drinking water is not affected.

TAKE ACTION! -- Send Governor Patterson a letter. Click here to tell him that New Yorkers don't deserve gas drilling toxics in their drinking water. Tell him to require the DEC to scrap their existing proposal and start over from scratch.

As always, thank you for your support!
Jim Miller
Executive Director
Brave New Films

Click here for more information

INSTRUCTIONS:

Go to the DoNotGasNY.org
At PAGE BOTTOM, enter your ZIP CODE. Only New Yorkers are eligible to take part in this alert.
Read the sample letter at page bottom and edit. Customized letters have greater impact.
Click "Send Your Message" to send your letter to your Governor Paterson.


To ensure delivery of our emails, please add info@bravenewfilms.org to your address book.
Also find us on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, iTunes or RSS. Click here to stop receiving updates.
Brave New Films | 10510 Culver Blvd., Culver City, CA 90232

BPA/pesticide law update-- contact County Exec now!...

Hi all...


Did you know that the Dutchess County Legislature earlier this month became only the fourth county in the state to ban BPA in baby bottles and sippy cups...and also passed a pesticide notification law?...


[see; http://www.midhudsonnews.com/News/2009/December09/22/DC_BPA_ban-22Dec09.html ;
http://www.midhudsonnews.com/News/2009/December09/08/DCL-08Dec09.html -- only coverage-- besides great articles this week in Northern/Southern Dutchess News; other newspapers have ignored; why?]


[join over 120 Dutchess folks signed to http://www.petitiononline.com/neighbor -- for NN/pesticide law!]


It's true...


...but you wouldn't know it from reading most of the local newspapers; these essentially ignored, sadly...


[thx to Northern/Southern Dutchess News' Rich Flaherty, Hank Gross, Cablevision for coverage though; PoJo wouldn't even print pic: 25-foot-high baby bottle just one block away at last Mon.'s press conference!]


So-- if you haven't yet email Steinhaus at countyexec@co.dutchess.ny.us to sign both of these NOW!...


And-- to the point here-- your letters to the editor to local newspapers on this are needed NOW, folks!...


[zip off the same 250-word letter to the editor to PoJo at letterstoeditor@poughkeepsiejournal.com, the Freeman at letters@freemanonline.com, Hudson Valley News: editorial@thehudsonvalleynews.com]


Here below-- just some of the great testimony from last Tuesday's public hearings on these two laws:


[...too bad NO reporters came to record this testimony from state-level experts-- why?...pathetic!...]


-- Laura Haight, Senior NYPIRG Environmental Associate: "Even Wal-Mart and Babies R Us have committed to sell only non-BPA baby items-- and we need pesticide neighbor notification legislation because, as an example, a baby in Long Island literally had to be hospitalized because of pesticide spray drift from a neighbor's property coming in through one of the windows in the house. Additionally, if the County Executive does not sign this by December 31st, it will not go into effect for another year."


[note-- Laura also noted, presciently, that "in Albany County, the County Executive presides over his public hearings"...(this was not the case here in Dutchess; Steinhaus had County Attorney Ron Wozniak do this-- not publicly on sixth floor of our County Office Building in Legislative Chambers mind you-- but buried away within the County Attorney's offices-- on the fifth floor of our County Office Building in Pok...and both public hearings were held last Tuesday MORNING(!)....(when working taxpayers couldn't go)]


-- Janet Gray, Director of Vassar College's Science, Technology, and Society Department and Science Adviser for the Breast Cancer Fund-- "We know pesticides are meant to kill; they're toxic to our nervous and endocrine systems-- a neighbor notification law for pesticide application is just common sense."


-- Debra Hall of the Sierra Club Mid-Hudson Group (Conservation Chair): "If there's a danger to our children, to our infants with BPA-- let's not use it. Let's just do the right thing, for once. Regarding pesticides, there's a cumulative effect-- a little bit here, a little bit there. I think people have a right to know when poisons are going to be sprayed next to them or near them-- they should have that right."


-- Beverly Canin, President of Breast Cancer Options, and a member of the New York State Department of Health Research Science Board: "It's imperative that Dutchess County take the Precautionary Principle seriously and put into into place as soon as possible to ban BPA in children's products. I'm here as a breast cancer survivor. I was diagnosed in late 2000. Only 10% to 15% of the cause for breast cancer can be traced to heredity; maybe to 25%-- so over 60% of it-- where is it from? It's only common sense that environmental factors are to blame. Currently only 5% to 10% of the funding for breast cancer research is on the effects of chemicals like synthetic estrogens like BPA."


-- Matt Wallach, Hudson Valley Program Coordinator for Citizens Campaign for the Environment
( http://www.CitizensCampaign.org -- with 3000 Dutchess signatures for NN/pesticide law-- and over 900 members in Dutchess County alone-- and over 900 letters sent into various county officials for NN/pesticide law; 300 to Steinhaus alone!)-- "Use of BPA is non-essential, though it is found in plastics #3 and #7 and most canned foods-- and too many baby products. Banning BPA in Dutchess County gives local children a stronger chance at a healthier future."


-- Conservative Co. Leg. Jim Doxsey speaking up for NN/pesticide law-- "I'm the Vice-Chair of our County Legislature's Public Safety Committee. This law is needed because family animals can bring pesticides into homes; these poisons are of great concerns. I see little to no fiscal impact to our county or pesticide applicators; the excuses I have heard to oppose this legislation are poor."


-- Tom Baldino, Beacon Conservation Advisory Council Chair: "We are loaded with cancer in our county-- my younger sister died of ovarian cancer this October. Passing these two pieces of legislation is just common sense to better protect all of us from toxins like BPA and pesticides."


[...and incredibly, one pesticide applicator there last week to testify actually tried to pass along faulty information-- telling all of us that Ulster County still has a voluntary registry for pesticide neighbor notification-- wrong!...(years ago even Ulster County GOP-led Leg. passed NN/pesticide law)...argh...]


So-- again-- email countyexec@co.dutchess.ny.us NOW for County Exec to sign both of these laws!...


Thx much to all who came out to join us last week for press conference for these two laws to be signed...


...pushing for our County Exec to sign into law the bill recently passed by our County Legislature for Dutchess to ban BPA in baby bottles, sippy cups, pacifiers, etc.-- and pesticide notification law as well...


[new below-- great letter on this from Rhinebeck resident and Breast Cancer Options Pres. Bev Canin]


Recall-- Dutchess County is now only fourth county in NY to ban BPA in baby bottles and sippy cups...


[thanx to bipartisan effort on this-- co-sponsored by GOP's Marge Horton and P. Wassell, D. Nash too]


Only Suffolk, Albany, and Schenectady counties have done so before Dutchess; see letter below to legislators from Town of Poughkeepsie resident and Vassar's own Janet Gray, editor for the Breast Cancer Fund's groundbreaking report State of Evidence 2008-- see http://www.BreastCancerFund.org ..


Finally-- one more time-- your letters to the editor to local newspapers on this are needed NOW, folks!...


[zip off the same 250-word letter to the editor to PoJo at letterstoeditor@poughkeepsiejournal.com, the Freeman at letters@freemanonline.com, Hudson Valley News: editorial@thehudsonvalleynews.com]


Bad enough most local papers completely ignored IDEA, other achievements-- hold 'em accountable!...
[ignored-- http://dutchessdemocracy.blogspot.com/2009/08/dutchess-progressive-help-make-it.html ]


Pass it on...


Joel
242-3571/876-2488
joeltyner@earthlink.net


p.s. Did you know that even Miller, Molinaro, Ball, Skartados, and Cahill all voted this past May 5th for A.6919-- "The Bisphenol-A-Free Children and Babies Act"?...(so what's Steinhaus' excuse here?!?)...A.6919 would "prohibit the manufacture, distribution, and sale of beverage and food containers containing bisphenol-A"(!)...[see: http://www.assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=A06919 ]...


[worry not, amigos...sure PoJo will eventually cover this issue...once they can make GOP look good...]


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Fact: "The vast majority of independent scientists-- those not working for industry-- are concerned about early-life low-dose exposures to BPA," said Janet Gray, a Vassar College professor who is science adviser to the Breast Cancer Fund.
[from Nicholas Kristof's Nov. 7th column"Chemicals in Our Food, and Bodies":
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/opinion/08kristof.html ]

Fact: In Aug. Albany/Schenectady Co. Leg.'s unanimously passed laws to ban baby bottles w/BPA.
[ http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=830114&category=SCHENECTADY http://www.keepitorganic.org/category/packaging-concerns/bisphenol-a-bpa/ ]

Fact: In Mar. Suffolk County Legislature voted unanimously to ban sale of BPA baby bottles/sippy cups.
http://www.newsday.com/services/newspaper/printedition/wednesday/health/ny-poban0412513812mar04,0,3333946.story


Fact: GOP Governors Rell and Pawlenty in CT/MN signed into law bipartisan laws banning BPA.
[see: http://www.healthytomorrow.org/2009/06/ct-to-ban-bpa.html ]

Fact: The Environmental Working Group has extensively documented cover-up of FDA re: BPA.
[see: http://www.ewg.org/reports/bpatimeline ; http://www.jsonline.com/news/53515392.html ;
http://www.utne.com/Environment/FDA-Might-Crack-Down-on-Bisphenol-A-or-BPA-1812.aspx ]


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Subject: testimony re: Local Law 209332


From: Kathy Curtis [Policy Director for http://www.Clean-NY.org ]


To: countyexec@co.dutchess.ny.us


Cc: countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us


Dear County Executive Steinhaus,



Attached and below please find Clean New York's testimony for Local Law 209332. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have questions. We strongly urge you to sign the bill, for Dutchess County's babies, children, economy, and environment.



kindest regards,



Kathleen A. Curtis, LPN


Policy Director, Clean New York



TESTIMONY TO THE DUTCHESS COUNTY EXECUTIVE



THE LOCAL LAW TO PROTECT BABIES AND TODDLERS FROM HARMFUL HEALTH EFFECTS CREATED BY CERTAIN INFANT AND CHILD CARE PRODUCTS

BY KATHLEEN CURTIS, POLICY DIRECTOR, CLEAN NEW YORK

DECEMBER 22, 2009

Thank you for the opportunity to present Clean New York's testimony in strong support of the Local Law 209332 of 2009 to protect infants and young children from harmful health effects created by certain infant and child care products. Clean New York is a state-level environmental health advocacy organization, dedicated to creating a world in which all children grow up free from toxic chemicals. We, along with WE ACT for Environmental Justice, co-coordinate the JustGreen Partnership, a collaboration of 50 environmental, health, environmental justice, and consumer organizations working for environmental health and justice for New York's people and communities. Addressing bisphenol A in products is a priority issue for the members of the JustGreen Partnership.

In addition to the groups that are testifying today, many organizations support moving away from BPA, but could not be here tonight. They include:

· NYS Nurses Association

· Physicians for Social Responsibility

· The Institute for Health and the Environment at the SUNY Albany School of Public Health

· Association of Comparative and Environmental Toxicology Students

· Capital Region Action Against Breast Cancer

· The Breast Cancer Fund

· WE ACT for Environmental Justice

· Environmental Advocates of New York

· Center for Health, Environment and Justice

· Natural Resources Defense Council

· Women's Voices for the Earth

· Huntington Breast Cancer Action Coalition


The short story on bisphenol A is that it is used in many applications, including those under consideration of this bill. It is found in nearly every American's body, and is at levels many times higher in babies and toddlers than in adults. BPA has been linked to a wide range of health effects - cancer, diabetes, obesity, reproductive dysfunction, damage to the brain. Safer materials are available, and major manufacturers are transitioning away from BPA. Major retailers are ceasing to sell BPA-based products.

Industry, meanwhile, is vigorously defending BPA. In the past, they cited the FDA as one of the government bodies that has found BPA safe. Subsequently, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel revealed that the chemical industry had been deep within the discussions at FDA, at the same time that independent scientists were shut out. Here's a quote from the Journal-Sentinel's May 16th article:


"In one instance, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's deputy director sought information from the BPA industry's chief lobbyist to discredit a Japanese study that found it caused miscarriages in workers who were exposed to it. This was before government scientists even had a chance to review the study."


The story goes on to note: "The Journal Sentinel reported last year that the trade group [meaning the American Chemistry Council] wrote entire sections of that draft [meaning the FDA's BPA assessment]. But the revelations contained in these e-mails show a pattern of preferential treatment over the past nine years that was not afforded to independent scientists.


"In one e-mail, the FDA asked the trade association's opinion of a study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on the prevalence of BPA. It is not clear why the FDA wouldn't do its own analysis or have the CDC provide that information."

In addition, the minutes of a recent gathering of the ACC and other relevant industries revealed plans for a publicity campaign to defend BPA. As reported in the Washington Post on May 31st:


"Industry representatives weighed a range of ideas, including 'using fear tactics [e.g. "Do you want to have access to baby food anymore?" as well as giving control back to consumers (e.g. you have a choice between the more expensive product that is frozen or fresh or foods packaged in cans) as ways to dissuade people from choosing BPA-free packaging,' the notes said."

The Post goes on to say: "Those in attendance said the mainstream media are ignoring their side of the controversy, and attendees talked about how the group is focusing on 'legislative battles and befriending people that are able to manipulate the legislative process,' the document said."

This report has led Connecticut Attorney General Blumenthal to start an investigation into industry misdeeds during the recent legislative battle in Connecticut.

The Connecticut Post reported on June 15th:

"Sen. Edward Meyer, D-Guilford, co-chairman of the Environment Committee, confirmed the extreme lobbying effort against the bill and stressed that tests on animals have established the links between cancer and BPA, which is used to harden plastics for baby bottles and gaskets on jars of food.

Another lawmaker told Hearst's Connecticut Newspapers on Monday that she was a target of "misinformation" from an industry lobbyist."

By contrast, more and more scientists are confirming BPA's potential harm. Last August, the Endocrine Society issued its first "scientific statement," concluding that for chemicals like BPA, "the concern is real."

The Federal Government has also made strong public statements about BPA. On September 30, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson announced that bisphenol A is on the short list of six chemicals EPA is developing action plans for, using regulatory tools under the federal Toxic Substances Control Act. Linda Birnbaum, director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, says she has seen enough studies on the chemical to be concerned about its effects on human health. She advises her children to avoid food packages containing BPA, and says consumers should absolutely be worried.

So don't let industry misrepresentations fool you: BPA is not safe, and in fact can cause harm at levels already found in our bodies. There are safer solutions available. You can act confidently to ban Bisphenol A in children's beverage containers, and in so doing, ensure that all Dutchess County children - innocently sipping their juice or milk - aren't also adding to their toxic burden. Please act quickly to enact local law 209332. Clean New York is deeply engaged in the science and policy aspects of this important issue. Don't hesitate to use us as a resource as you enact and implement this policy.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:06:54 -0500
From: "Beverly Canin"
To:
Subject: Bisphenol A - BPA Act - LL209332

County Executive William Steinhaus
22 Market. St.,
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601

Dear Mr. Steinhaus,

As a citizen of Dutchess County and a staunch advocate for breast cancer and other health-related issues, I am appealing to you to help protect our most vulnerable population by signing into law the 'Toxin Free Toddlers and Babies Act (BPA Act)' (LL 209332), which prohibits, within the County of Dutchess, the sale or offer for sale of children's beverage containers, pacifiers, or replacement nipples for bottles that contain Bisphenol A (BPA).

As stated in LL 209332, BPA is a synthetic estrogen which disrupts healthy human development and can lead to such complications as an altered immune system, hyperactivity, reproductive health problems, increased risk of breast and prostate cancer, obesity, and diabetes. It is commonly contained in polycarbonate plastics, including baby bottles, cups, pacifiers, and replacement nipples for bottles designed for use by young children and epoxy resins used to line the interior of commonly used food and beverage cans. BPA has been shown to pose a significant health risk to infants and young children as this age group has been found to have the highest levels of BPA exposure.

Most disturbing are recent and on-going studies which show that pre-natal to early childhood exposure to BPA can be the precursor for future development of disease and disorders, including early puberty in boys and girls. Infants and toddlers are disproportionately exposed to BPA, which leaches from the plastic and epoxy-lined baby bottles and food containers, especially when they are warmed, as well as sippy cups and pacifiers. In addition, they are at the most vulnerable stage for hormone disruption.


The are safer alternatives already in the market and the need for this measure has been substantiated by similar legislation passed in Albany, Schenectady and Suffolk Counties in New York State, in Connecticut and Minnesota, and in Chicago. Massachusetts has released a public health alert warning pregnant women and young infants and children to avoid BPA containing substances.

There are efforts to achieve regulation of BPA at the federal level. Until that happens, it is critical that we act locally to protect our infants and toddlers, who are, of course, our future.

Please support this critical Resolution and sign into law the 'Toxin Free Toddlers and Babies Act (BPA Act)' (LL 209332).

Thank you.

Beverly Canin
Rhinbeck, NY 12572
bcanin@webjogger.net
President,
Breast Cancer Options
http://www.breastcanceroptions.org

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More On Why Precautionary Principle Should be Made Real Here Re: Pesticides:

Fact: 70% of NYS residents live in counties that have Ulster, Rockland, Erie, Monroe, Nassau, Suffolk, Tompkins, Westchester, and Albany counties (along with NYC) already have Neighbor Notification laws for pesticide application; people here in Dutchess deserve the same protection as 70% of New Yorkers.

Fact: Neighbor Notification laws sensibly require commercial lawn pesticide applicators to provide 48-hour advance notice to adjacent property owners prior to certain lawn applications, and posting of residential lawn pesticide applications (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precautionary_principle ).

Fact: The Daily Freeman has endorsed neighbor notification laws-- along with Scenic Hudson, Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, NYPIRG, Cancer Awareness Coalition, 1 in 9 (Long Island Breast Cancer Action Coalition), American Lung Association of New York State, Mid-Hudson Breast Health Action Project of the Breast Cancer Network of Benedictine Hospital, National Audubon Society, New York League of Women Voters, National Education Association, National Wildlife Federation, New York Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides, New York League of Conservation Voters, New York State Breast Cancer Network, New York State Healthy Schools Network, New York State United Teachers, New York State Parent Teachers Association Board of Health, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Riverkeeper, Sierra Club-Atlantic Chapter, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals-New York, Breast Cancer Help, Central New York Labor-Religion Coalition, Citizens Environmental Coalition, Coalition of Community Gardeners, Concerned Parents for a Healthy School Environment, Consumer Policy Institute of Consumer's Union, Fellowship of Reconciliation, Kids Against Pollution, Mothers and Others for a Livable Planet, and Citizen Action of New York.

Fact: 135 towns across Canada have literally banned aesthetic use of pesticides; all we're talking about here in this case is 48 hours' notice for commercial application of pesticides within 150 feet of houses.
[see: http://www.organiclandscape.org/en/Canada_&_US_68.html ]

Fact: Pesticides pose a broad range of health harms to humans-- particularly to pregnant mothers, infants, children, senior citizens and people with impaired health, many types of cancer, neurological
disorders, respiratory ailments, reproductive disorders, and eye and skin damage; see:

"Breast Cancer Fund Study Finds Strong Cancer-Chemical Link" by Elaine Shannon [2/9/09]
http://www.enviroblog.org/2009/02/breast-cancer-fund-study-finds-strong-cancer-chemical-link.html

"Pesticide Linked to Breast Cancer" [BBC 12/4/98]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/227178.stm

"Breast Cancer Linked to Pesticide DDT, Study Suggests" [Science Daily 10/9/07]
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/10/071009082406.htm

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:00:45 -0500

Subject: Banning Bisphenol A


From Hudson River Sloop Clearwater Envir. Director Mannajo Greene


To: countyexec@co.dutchess.ny.us


County Executive William Steinhaus
22 Market. St.,
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Voice (845) 486-2000 Fax (845) 486-2021
e-Mail countyexec@co.dutchess.ny.us

Dear Bill:

I am writing to urge enactment the Dutchess County ordinance restricting BPA's use in baby bottles and children's drink containers. This is an especially important issue to me because back in the mid-1990's as the Recycling Coordinator for Ulster County, when I learned of the effects of Bis-A from the book, Our Stolen Future, we met with Stewarts and had to cancel (or not renew) a wonderful program to teach reuse by using refillable Lexan polycarbonate bottles for single servings of milk and other beverages in school cafeterias throughout Ulster County. The possibility of Bis-A leaching out of the plastic milk bottles into the milk and causing hornone disruption in youth was unthinkable. GE soon stopped manufacturing the small single serving milk bottles for this use.

Bisphenol A (BPA) has been known to be estrogenic (act like estrogen) since the 1930s, yet is still used widely in consumer products like polycarbonate bottles and food can linings. Because of its widespread use and easy ability to leach into our food and drink under regular conditions, bisphenol A is found in over 93% of Americans at levels above those shown to cause health problems in laboratory studies. Acting at levels similar to hormones in our bodies, minute amounts (in the range of parts per trillion) of BPA can trigger changes that can lead to health effects like obesity, heart disease, reproductive problems, and cancer. Infants and toddlers are among those most vulnerable to BPA's impacts, because they are less able to excrete it and their developing bodies are more prone to hormone disruption.


We urge Dutchess County to join Albany, Schenectady and Suffolk Counties, along with Minnesota, Connecticut and Chicago in restricting BPA's use in babies or children's drink containers. There are many alternatives already on the market, and many leading companies have already make the switch completely. By signing the Toxic Free Toddlers and Babies bill into law, you can help ensure all of Dutchess County's babies have safe sippy cups, bottles and pacifiers and bring closer the day that safer alternatives will replace BPA containing products everywhere.

Many thanks for your support of this important piece of legislation.

Sincerely,

Manna
--

Manna Jo Greene, Environmental Director
Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.
724 Wolcott Ave., Beacon, NY 12508
845-265-8080 x 7113 Fax: 845-831-2821
845-807-1270 (cell)


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:30:57 -0500


From: Laura Haight


[top Environmental Associate statewide for NYPIRG]


Subject: [HudsonValley] Action Alert: Urge Steinhaus to protect children in Dutchess


Greetings,

Earlier this month, the Dutchess County Legislature passed two important public health bills: the Pesticide Neighbor Notification Law and the Toxin Free Toddlers and Babies Act.


County Executive William Steinhaus has until January 6th to decide whether or not to sign them into law. He needs to hear from Dutchess County residents now! Please take one or more of the following actions:


1) CALL, WRITE, FAX OR EMAIL the County Executive and urge him to sign these bills into law!
County Executive William R. Steinhaus
22 Market Street
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Voice (845) 486-2000
Fax (845) 486-2021
Email countyexec@co.dutchess.ny.us


2) SPEAK OUT! There will be PUBLIC HEARINGS on these bills on TUESDAY, DECEMBER 22:


10:30 a.m. - Toxin Free Toddlers and Babies Act


11:00 a.m. - Pesticide Neighbor Notification Law

Please attend and show your support for protecting the health of Dutchess County residents. Both hearings will take place in the County Attorney's Office at 22 Market Street in Poughkeepsie on the fifth floor.


3) SPREAD THE WORD! Please forward this e-mail on to other Dutchess County residents who care about these issues.

BACKGROUND:

Pesticide Neighbor Notification Law (LL 209331): This law requires commercial pesticide applicators to give residents 48-hours advance notice, in writing, before spraying toxic chemicals on lawns and trees on neighboring properties. Advance notice gives you the opportunity to take basic precautions to protect yourself and your loved ones from pesticide spray drift, like closing windows, covering your picnic tables and barbecue, and keeping your pets and children indoors. Ten other New York counties, including Ulster, Westchester, Rockland and Albany, as well as New York City, now have this protection.


[recall my http://www.petitiononline.com/neighbor -- over 120 Dutchess folks signed on; join us now!]


Toxin Free Toddlers and Babies Act (LL 209332): This law prohibits the sale in Dutchess County of children's baby bottles, cups, and pacifiers containing Bisphenol A (BPA). BPA is a chemical that is used in food and beverage containers and other products that are intended for use by children. Extensive scientific research in recent years has documented BPA's potential to cause a wide variety of health problems, even when present only in very low doses, including increased risk for breast and prostate cancer, heart disease, diabetes, infertility, early puberty, and damage to brain development and function. Young children and babies are especially vulnerable to BPA. There are many safer alternatives available for the products covered by this bill. Dutchess would be the fourth county in New York to ban BPA.

By signing these two bills into law this holiday season, County Executive Steinhaus can give the gift of health to Dutchess County residents this year, particularly infants and children.


To see copies of the bills, go to:

http://www.dutchessny.gov/CountyGov/Departments/Legislature/ResolutionsPDF/209331.pdf


http://www.dutchessny.gov/CountyGov/Departments/Legislature/ResolutionsPDF/209332.pdf

For more information, please contact NYPIRG at 518-436-0876.

* Please forward far and wide*

Apologies for cross-posting!


Laura Haight, NYPIRG
518-436-0876, ext. 258
518-588-5481 (cell)


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:36:04 -0500 (EST)
From: "Bobbi Chase Wilding, Clean New York"
Reply-To: clean.bobbi@gmail.com
To: joeltyner@earthlink.net
Subject: Will Dutchess County Executive Steinhaus be Santa or the Grinch?
Envelope-From:
X_email_KEY: 128535498
X-ELNK-AV: 0
X-ELNK-Info: sbv=0; sbrc=.0; sbf=0b; sbw=000;

Empowering New York's women to achieve environmental health and justice.


Dear Joel,

Dutchess County is now poised to become the fourth county in the state to take action to limit the toxic chemical bisphenol A in baby bottles and sippy cups. The bill that passed the County Legislature on December 7th - in no small part due to emails from folks like you - takes a step further and includes pacifiers and replacement nipples.


County Executive William Steinhaus has until January 6th to sign the bill. Like the legislature, Mr. Steinhaus is under heavy pressure from the American Chemistry Council and other trade associations. But just this week the Director of the National Institute on Environmental Health Sciences and National Toxicology Program, Dr. Linda Birnbaum, publicly stated that people should avoid BPA-containing products, and new scientific research raised questions about BPA's links to miscarriages and intestine problems.


Will County Executive Steinhaus be Santa Claus or the Grinch this holiday season? It's within his power to protect Dutchess County babies and toddlers from BPA. He needs to hear from you!


As a Dutchess County residents, you can take action in a number of ways:

1) Send an email today!

2) Encourage your family and friends to do the same (there's a link for this once you've taken action on the link above).

3) Come speak directly to the County Executive at the public hearing: 10:30 am on Tuesday, Dec. 22 at 22 Market Street in the Dutchess County Office Building (on the fifth floor, in the County Attorney's office). This is incredibly effective and helpful. Let us know you're attending by replying to this email.


4) Come stand in support of the bill at Monday's news conference: 11:30 am (12/21) at One Civic Center Plaza (corner of Main and Market Streets) in Poughkeepsie. We'll have the giant baby bottle with us. Again, let us know you're coming by replying to this email.


Thank you for making this holiday season a little brighter by preventing children from toxic chemicals in products they rely on.

Best,


Bobbi Chase Wilding
Organizing Director
Clean New York
323 Bonnyview Lane
Schenectady, NY 12306

518-708-3875
clean.bobbi@gmail.com
www.clean-ny.org
twitter: @clean_bobbi

Clean New York seeks a world where all children grow up free from toxic chemicals in their bodies or environment. Visit our website at http://www.clean-ny.org. You are receiving this email because you, or someone using this email address, signed up as a member of Clean New York or expressed interest in protecting kids from toxic chemicals.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://www.co.dutchess.ny.us/CountyGov/Departments/Legislature/CLagenda.htm ...

209332 LOCAL LAW NO. OF 2009, A LOCAL LAW ESTABLISHING THE TOXIN FREE TODDLERS AND BABIES ACT
A local law prohibiting the sale of children's beverage containers, pacifiers, or replacement nipples for bottles that contain Bisphenol A. The law provides for a civil fine of $500 for an initial violation of the law and a civil fine of $1,000 for each subsequent violation.
http://www.dutchessny.gov/CountyGov/Departments/Legislature/ResolutionsPDF/209332.pdf


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>From Town of Poughkeepsie resident Janet Gray (grayj@vassar.edu)...

[note-- Janet Gray is the editor for the Breast Cancer Fund's groundbreaking report, State of the Evidence 2008-- check it out for yourself @ http://www.BreastCancerFund.org !]

To: countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us
Subject: Toxin Free Toddlers and Babies Act: Please vote yes
Date: Dec 6, 2009 3:20 PM
Dear Member of the Dutchess County Legislature:

I was pleased to hear that the 'Toxin Free Toddlers and Babies Act (BPA Act)' successfully passed at the committee level and will be voted upon this Monday [tonight 7 pm!] by the full membership of the Dutchess County Legislature. I am again writing to urge you act positively and swiftly on the proposed act, a local law that is aimed towards the elimination of the toxic chemical, bisphenol A (BPA) from infant and children's drinking containers and pacifiers. BP A is a known endocrine disruptor that is found almost universally in the bodies of American adults, children, and infants. In a report just released this past Thursday by the Environmental Working Group, it is clear that it is also found in developing infants before birth.

BPA has been linked directly to altered health effects in young children (neural and behavioral problems) and adults (increases in cardiac disorders, diabetes, male sexual dysfunction). In animal studies, all of the problems found in humans have also been found, as well as increased incidence of breast and prostate cancers, and a wide number of reproductive, metabolic and neurological disorders.

What is most critical about the majority of these studies is that they show that exposures during early development, from the prenatal period through early childhood, set the patterns for the development of disease later in life. Decreasing exposures to BPA is important for all people, but is absolutely critical for the youngest and most vulnerable among us.

We are exposed to BPA in through many sources, but the major source of exposure for young children is through the food they eat and the liquids they drink, because of leeching of BPA from plastic containers and epoxy-lined cans. The bill before you will eliminate those critical sources of exposure for our most vulnerable populations, thereby actually moving us towards true disease prevention.

Three counties in New York State, at least two municipalities, and two states have passed similar legislation. The State of Massachusetts has released a public health alert warning pregnant women and young infants and children to avoid BPA containing substances. Ideally our federal government will move towards regulating BPA and making local initiatives unnecessary. In the absence of that federal regulatory action, it is critical that local governments move to protect their citizens.

I urge you to take action and ban BPA from products ingested by and suckled by infants and young children in Dutchess County.

Thank you,
Janet Gray, Ph.D

Professor, Department of Psychology
Director, Program in Science, Technology & Society
Participant, Program in Neuroscience & Behavior
Vassar College
124 Raymond Avenue-Box 246
Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0246

phone: (845) 437-7378
FAX: (845) 437-7538
e-mail: grayj@vassar.edu

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>From http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/opinion/08kristof.html ...

OP-ED COLUMNIST
Chemicals in Our Food, and Bodies
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
Published: November 7, 2009

Your body is probably home to a chemical called bisphenol A, or BPA. It's a synthetic estrogen that United States factories now use in everything from plastics to epoxies - to the tune of six pounds per American per year. That's a lot of estrogen.
More than 92 percent of Americans have BPA in their urine, and scientists have linked it - though not conclusively - to everything from breast cancer to obesity, from attention deficit disorder to genital abnormalities in boys and girls alike.
Now it turns out it's in our food.

Consumer Reports magazine tested an array of brand-name canned foods for a report in its December issue and found BPA in almost all of them. The magazine says that relatively high levels turned up, for example, in Progresso vegetable soup, Campbell's condensed chicken noodle soup, and Del Monte Blue Lake cut green beans.

The magazine also says it found BPA in the canned liquid version of Similac Advance infant formula (but not in the powdered version) and in canned Nestlé Juicy Juice (but not in the juice boxes). The BPA in the food probably came from an interior coating used in many cans...

More than 200 studies have shown links between low doses of BPA and adverse health effects, according to the Breast Cancer Fund, which is trying to ban the chemical from food and beverage containers.

"The vast majority of independent scientists - those not working for industry - are concerned about early-life low-dose exposures to BPA," said Janet Gray, a Vassar College professor who is science adviser to the Breast Cancer Fund.

Published journal articles have found that BPA given to pregnant rats or mice can cause malformed genitals in their offspring, as well as reduced sperm count among males. For example, a European journal found that male mice exposed to BPA were less likely to make females pregnant, and the Journal of Occupational Health found that male rats administered BPA had less sperm production and lower testicular weight.

This year, the journal Environmental Health Perspectives found that pregnant mice exposed to BPA had babies with abnormalities in the cervix, uterus and vagina. Reproductive Toxicology found that even low-level exposure to BPA led to the mouse equivalent of early puberty for females. And an array of animal studies link prenatal BPA exposure to breast cancer and prostate cancer.

While most of the studies are on animals, the Journal of the American Medical Association reported last year that humans with higher levels of BPA in their blood have "an increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and liver-enzyme abnormalities." Another published study found that women with higher levels of BPA in their blood had more miscarriages.

Scholars have noted some increasing reports of boys born with malformed genitals, girls who begin puberty at age 6 or 8 or even earlier, breast cancer in women and men alike, and declining sperm counts among men. The Endocrine Society, an association of endocrinologists, warned this year that these kinds of abnormalities may be a consequence of the rise of endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and it specifically called on regulators to re-evaluate BPA.

Last year, Canada became the first country to conclude that BPA can be hazardous to humans, and Massachusetts issued a public health advisory in August warning against any exposure to BPA by pregnant or breast-feeding women or by children under the age of 2.

The Food and Drug Administration, which in the past has relied largely on industry studies - and has generally been asleep at the wheel - is studying the issue again. Bills are also pending in Congress to ban BPA from food and beverage containers.

"When you have 92 percent of the American population exposed to a chemical, this is not one where you want to be wrong," said Dr. Ted Schettler of the Science and Environmental Health Network. "Are we going to quibble over individual rodent studies, or are we going to act?"

While the evidence isn't conclusive, it justifies precautions. In my family, we're cutting down on the use of those plastic containers that contain BPA to store or microwave food, and I'm drinking water out of a metal bottle now. In my reporting around the world, I've come to terms with the threats from warlords, bandits and tarantulas. But endocrine disrupting chemicals - they give me the willies.

################################################

>From Sunday's New York Times-- http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/06/opinion/06kristof.html ...

Cancer From the Kitchen?
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
Published: December 5, 2009
The battle over health care focuses on access to insurance, or tempests like the one that erupted over new mammogram guidelines.

But what about broader public health challenges? What if breast cancer in the United States has less to do with insurance or mammograms and more to do with contaminants in our water or air -- or in certain plastic containers in our kitchens? What if the surge in asthma and childhood leukemia reflect, in part, the poisons we impose upon ourselves?

This last week I attended a fascinating symposium at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, exploring whether certain common chemicals are linked to breast cancer and other ailments.

Dr. Philip Landrigan, the chairman of the department of preventive medicine at Mount Sinai, said that the risk that a 50-year-old white woman will develop breast cancer has soared to 12 percent today, from 1 percent in 1975. (Some of that is probably a result of better detection.) Younger people also seem to be developing breast cancer: This year a 10-year-old in California, Hannah, is fighting breast cancer and recording her struggle on a blog.

Likewise, asthma rates have tripled over the last 25 years, Dr. Landrigan said. Childhood leukemia is increasing by 1 percent per year. Obesity has surged. One factor may be lifestyle changes - like less physical exercise and more stress and fast food - but some chemicals may also play a role.

Take breast cancer. One puzzle has been that most women living in Asia have low rates of breast cancer, but ethnic Asian women born and raised in the United States don't enjoy that benefit. At the symposium, Dr. Alisan Goldfarb, a surgeon specializing in breast cancer, pointed to a chart showing breast cancer rates by ethnicity.

"If an Asian woman moves to New York, her daughters will be in this column," she said, pointing to "whites." "It is something to do with the environment."
What's happening? One theory starts with the well-known fact that women with more lifetime menstrual cycles are at greater risk for breast cancer, because they're exposed to more estrogen. For example, a woman who began menstruating before 12 has a 30 percent greater risk of breast cancer than one who began at 15 or later.

It's also well established that Western women are beginning puberty earlier, and going through menopause later. Dr. Maida Galvez, a pediatrician who runs Mount Sinai's pediatric environmental health specialty unit, told the symposium that American girls in the year 1800 had their first period, on average, at about age 17. By 1900 that had dropped to 14. Now it is 12.


A number of studies, mostly in animals, have linked early puberty to exposure to pesticides, P.C.B.'s and other chemicals. One class of chemicals that creates concern - although the evidence is not definitive - is endocrine disruptors, which are often similar to estrogen and may fool the body into setting off hormonal changes. This used to be a fringe theory, but it is now being treated with great seriousness by the Endocrine Society, the professional association of hormone specialists in the United States.

These endocrine disruptors are found in everything from certain plastics to various cosmetics. "There's a ton of stuff around that has estrogenic material in it," Dr. Goldfarb said. "There's makeup that you rub into your skin for a youthful appearance that is really estrogen."

More than 80,000 new chemicals have been developed since World War II, according to the Children's Environmental Health Center at Mount Sinai. Even of the major chemicals, fewer than 20 percent have been tested for toxicity to children, the center says.

Representative Louise Slaughter, the only microbiologist in the House of Representatives, introduced legislation this month that would establish a comprehensive program to monitor endocrine disruptors. That's an excellent idea, because as long as we're examining our medical system, there's a remarkable precedent for a public health effort against a toxic substance. The removal of lead from gasoline resulted in an 80 percent decline in lead levels in our blood since 1976 - along with a six-point gain in children's I.Q.'s, Dr. Landrigan said.

I asked these doctors what they do in their own homes to reduce risks. They said that they avoid microwaving food in plastic or putting plastics in the dishwasher, because heat may cause chemicals to leach out. And the symposium handed out a reminder card listing "safer plastics" as those marked (usually at the bottom of a container) 1, 2, 4 or 5.

It suggests that the "plastics to avoid" are those numbered 3, 6 and 7 (unless they are also marked "BPA-free"). Yes, the evidence is uncertain, but my weekend project is to go through containers in our house and toss out 3's, 6's and 7's.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

LOCAL LAW NO. -2009, A LOCAL LAW ESTABLISHING THE TOXIN FREE TODDLERS AND BABIES ACT

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNTY LEGISLATURE OF THE COUNTY OF DUTCHESS, as follows:

Section 1. Legislative Intent.

This Legislature hereby finds and determines that Bisphenol A ("BPA") is a chemical commonly contained in polycarbonate plastics, including baby bottles, cups, pacifiers, and replacement nipples for bottles designed for use by young children and epoxy resins used to line the interior of commonly used food and beverage cans.

This Legislature also finds that studies have shown that BPA is a synthetic estrogen which disrupts healthy human development and can lead to such complications as an altered immune system, hyperactivity, reproductive health problems, increased risk of breast and prostate cancer, obesity, and diabetes.

This Legislature further finds and determines that BPA is released into food and beverages in food and drink containers manufactured with the chemical when those containers are warmed.

This Legislature also finds that BPA has been shown to pose a significant health risk to infants and young children as this age group has been found to have the highest levels of BPA exposure.
This Legislature further finds and determines that several states and the federal government have started considering a ban on BPA in food and beverage containers and other products that are intended for use by children.
This Legislature finds that Dutchess County is committed to protecting the public health and welfare of our County's infants and young children, whose growing bodies are vulnerable to the health hazards caused by BPA.

Therefore, the purpose of this local law is to protect infants and young children from the harmful health effects of BPA.

Section 2. Definitions.

As used in this law, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated:

A) "CHILDREN'S BEVERAGE CONTAINER" shall mean any bottle, cup, cup lid, straw or other container intended to be used by children under the age of three (3) years old for the consumption of liquids.
B) "BPA" shall mean Bisphenol A.

C) "PERSON" shall mean any natural person, individual, corporation, unincorporated association, proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, joint stock association, or other entity of business of any kind.
Section 3. Prohibitions.

No person shall sell or offer for sale children's beverage containers, pacifiers, or replacement nipples for bottles that contain BPA within the County of Dutchess.

Section 4. Enforcement.

This law shall be enforced by the Dutchess County Department of Health.

Section 5. Authority to Promulgate Rules and Regulations.
The Commissioner of the Dutchess County Department of Health is hereby authorized and empowered to promulgate such rules and regulations as he or she deems necessary to implement this law.

Section 6. Penalties.
Any person who knowingly violates the provisions of this law shall be subject to a civil penalty of five hundred dollars ($500) for an initial violation of the law and a penalty of one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each subsequent violation.

Section 7. Applicability.

This law shall apply to any and all actions occurring on or after the effective date of this law.

Section 8. Severability.
If any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or part of this law or the application thereof to any person, individual, corporation, firm, partnership, entity, or circumstance shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such order or judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or part of this law, or in its application to the person, individual, corporation, firm, partnership, entity, or circumstance directly involved in the controversy in which such order or judgment shall be rendered.

Section 9. Effective Date.

This law shall take effect on the ninetieth (90th) day immediately subsequent to filing in the Office of the Secretary of State.

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

re: Avatar, Afghanistan, Iraq-- Cameron's movie is needed wake-up call...

"Everything is backwards now, like out there is the true world and in here is the dream..."

-- Jake Sully in "Avatar"

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Hi all...

Just came back from seeing "Avatar" for a second time (this time in 3-D)-- and once again blown away...

Just daydreamin'...

What do you think might happen if all who saw "Avatar" called Congress for troops to come home?...

[Cameron wants us to think/act-- http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/hmg-avatar-hidden-messages.html ;
"Avatar" took in more money over Christmas weekend than any other movie in history; see proof here:
http://www.alternet.org/rss/breaking_news/101360/%22avatar%22_rules_as_us_moviegoers_set_record/ .]

You never know; fact is that if everyone who sees "Avatar" this winter is inspired, there WILL be change!

So-- twelve reasons here to call Congress at (800) 828-0498-- for our troops to come home without delay:

[esp. note reason #1-- unfortunately neither Hinchey, Hall, nor Murphy signed on to 12/18 letter-- why?]

1. Rep.'s Lee, McGovern, Jones and Colleagues Ask Speaker for Up-Or-Down Vote re: Afghanistan
http://lee.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=57§iontree=35,57&itemid=1839 [12/18 press release]

2. Rep. Mass: "Christmas Eve Is 3,000th Day in Afghanistan and 30th Anniversary of Russian Invasion"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-eric-jj-massa/christmas-eve-is-the-3000_b_402074.html

3. "How to Exit Afghanistan" by Selig Harrison
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20100111/harrison

4. "Cause and Effect in the 'Terror War'" by Glenn Greenwald
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/12/29-1

5. "Are U.S. Wars Fueling Domestic Terror?" by Katrina vanden Heuvel
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/edcut/509506/are_us_wars_fueling_domestic_terrorist_threats_

6. "The Joys of Airstrikes and Anonymity" by Glenn Greenwald
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/12/27-1

7. "Obama and the Permanent War Budget" by William Hartung
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/12/23-13

8. "Afghanistan: $57,077.60-- Surging by the Minute" by Jo Comerford
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/12/17-5

9. "A Lesson on Nonviolence for the President" by Eric Stoner
http://www.fpif.org/articles/a_lesson_on_nonviolence_for_the_president

10. "The U.S. and Afghan Tragedy" by Stephen Zunes and Khushal Arsala
http://www.fpif.org/reports/the_us_and_afghan_tragedy

11. You're not alone; join http://www.DutchessPeace.org http://www.UnitedforPeace.org ! (go, Fred N.!):
http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20091228/NEWS01/912280319/Korean-War-vet-works-for-peace-in-Dutchess

12. Dutchess taxpayers alone have spent $1.2 billion on war in Afghanistan and Iraq since 2001(!).
[see: http://www.NationalPriorities.org ]

Pass it on...(let's keep Cameron's dream of "Avatar" alive!)...

Joel
242-3571/876-2488
joeltyner@earthlink.net

p.s. Just one more to ponder on this (and hopefully be inspired to action!)...(see Yoko's full-page ad?)...

"War Is Over If You Want It-- John and Yoko, Forty Years Later" by Jon Wiener
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion/509502/war_is_over_if_you_want_it_john_and_yoko_40_years_later

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-eric-jj-massa/christmas-eve-is-the-3000_b_402074.html ...

Rep. Eric J.J. Massa
U.S. Representative from New York

[again-- why aren't Hinchey, Hall, Murphy, Gillibrand, Schumer writing essays and letters like this?]

Posted: December 23, 2009 01:41 PM
Christmas Eve Is the 3,000th Day in Afghanistan and 30th Anniversary of the Russian Invasion

Christmas Eve is a time to gather with friends and family to reflect on the good things in life. It's a time to share our joys and our hopes for peace on earth and good will towards all.
This year Christmas Eve has a sad and ironic twist to it however.

As we begin our deployment of 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan, this Christmas Eve will also mark the 3,000th day of the war in Afghanistan and the 30th anniversary of the initial Russian invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. Thus far, this war has already cost the American taxpayer a minimum of $300,000,000,000 according to the Congressional Research Service (and that's just the funding that's "on budget").

Sadly, the fact that we're spending about $101 million per day in this war is the good news. The financial cost of this war is nothing compared to the fact that 937 American troops have been killed, and 4,434 have been wounded (and that's not counting the thousands more that will carry the memories of this war for their entire lives).

Exactly 50 days ago from Christmas Eve, because of all of these reasons, I took to the floor of the House and formalized my call for an end to this war of occupation and attrition.

As a 24-year retired military officer and former special assistant to the then Supreme Commander of NATO, General Wesley Clark, I am deeply troubled by the fact that we have yet to even define victory. Having recently witnessed an election where Hamid Karzai "won" despite having about 1/3 of his ballots thrown out for election fraud, I also know that we cannot continue engaging in nation building by partnering with one of the most corrupt narco-governments in the world.

Additionally, being on the House Armed Services Committee and having listened to the testimony of General Stanley McChrystal, Ambassador Karl Eikenberry, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, there is nothing that convinces me that we can force Democracy on a tribal people through continued military occupation or escalation.

History has shown us what happens when military forces try to occupy Afghanistan, and we can learn a lot from the Russian invasion which began on December 24th, 1979.

Our friends at the Brave New Foundation have been working on an ongoing project called ReThink Afghanistan and today, they released a great piece on the lessons we can learn from the Russian invasion. I HIGHLY recommend watching this video and sharing it with your friends and family:

So what can we do?

Last week, I signed onto a letter with several members of Congress to demand a Congressional debate followed by an up or down vote in the House on the escalation. It has been eight years since Congress has had any sort of meaningful debate on this critical issue and the public deserves to know where their member of Congress stands.

This is where you can help

If you agree that the American people deserve an up or down vote on the escalation in Afghanistan, then I urge you to call your member of Congress and Senators to tell them to support an Up or Down vote on this issue.

Nothing gets the attention of a member of Congress quite like returning from the holidays to discover 500 voicemails demanding action.

You can find your Congressman or Congresswoman by visiting http://house.gov .

You can find your Senators by visiting http://senate.gov .

Let's declare that enough is enough on this 3,000th day of the war in Afghanistan. It's time to bring our troops home.

P.S. Don't forget to recommend this post and send an email to your friends and family to recruit their help.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>From http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/12/29-1 ...

Published on Tuesday, December 29, 2009 by Salon.com

Cause and Effect in the 'Terror War'
by Glenn Greenwald

"In all their alleged allegedness, this Administration has an allergy to the concept of war, and thus to the tools of war, including strategy and war aims" -- Supreme Tough Guy Warrior Mark Steyn, National Review, yesterday.

"The White House has authorized an expansion of the C.I.A.'s drone program in Pakistan's lawless tribal areas, officials said this week, to parallel the president's decision, announced Tuesday, to send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan" -- New York Times, December 4, 2009.
"In the midst of two unfinished major wars, the United States has quietly opened a third, largely covert front against Al Qaeda in Yemen" -- New York Times, yesterday.
_______

Actually, if you count our occupation of Iraq, our twice-escalated war in Afghanistan, our rapidly escalating bombing campaigns in Pakistan and Yemen, and various forms of covert war involvement in Somalia, one could reasonably say that we're fighting five different wars in Muslim countries -- or, to use the NYT's jargon, "five fronts" in the "Terror War" (Obama yesterday specifically mentioned Somalia and Yemen as places where, euphemistically, "we will continue to use every element of our national power"). Add to those five fronts the "crippling" sanctions on Iran many Democratic Party luminaries are now advocating, combined with the chest-besting threats from our Middle East client state that the next wars they fight against Muslims will be even "harsher" than the prior ones, and it's almost easier to count the Muslim countries we're not attacking or threatning than to count the ones we are. Yet this still isn't enough for America's right-wing super-warriors, who accuse the five-front-war-President of "an allergy to the concept of war." 

In the wake of the latest failed terrorist attack on Northwest Airlines, one can smell the excitement in the air -- that all-too-familiar, giddy, bipartisan climate that emerges in American media discourse whenever there's a new country we get to learn about so that we can explain why we're morally and strategically justified in bombing it some more. "Yemen" is suddenly on every Serious Person's lips. We spent the last month centrally involved to some secret degree in waging air attacks on that country -- including some that resulted in numerous civilian deaths -- but everyone now knows that this isn't enough and it's time to Get Really Serious and Do More. 

For all the endless, exciting talk about the latest Terrorist attack, one issue is, as usual, conspicuously absent: motive. Why would a young Nigerian from a wealthy, well-connected family want to blow himself on one of our airplanes along with 300 innocent people, and why would Saudi and Yemeni extremists want to enable him to do so? When it comes to Terrorism, discussions of motive have been declared more or less taboo from the start because of the dishonest equation of motive discussions with justification -- as though understanding the reasons why X happens is to posit that X is legitimate and justifiable. Causation simply is; it has nothing to do with issues of morality, blame, or justification. Yet all that is generally permitted to be said in such situations is that Terrorists try to harm us because they're Evil, and we (of course) are not, and that's generally the end of the discussion.

Despite that taboo, evidence always ends up emerging on this question. As numerous reports have indicated, the Al Qaeda group in the Arabian Peninsula has said that this attempted attack is in "retaliation" for the multiple, recent missile attacks on Yemen in which numerous innocent Muslim civilians were killed, as well as for the U.S.'s multi-faceted support for the not-exactly-democratic Yemeni government. That is similar to reports that Nidal Hasan was motivated to attack Fort Hood because "he was upset at the killing of Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan." And one finds this quote from an anonymous Yemeni official tacked on to the end of this week's NYT article announcing the "widening terror war" in Yemen -- as though it's just an afterthought:

"The problem is that the involvement of the United States creates sympathy for Al Qaeda. The cooperation is necessary -- but there is no doubt that it has an effect for the common man. He sympathizes with Al Qaeda."

As always, the most confounding aspect of the reaction to the latest attempted terrorist episode is the professed confusion and self-righteous innocence that is universally expressed. Whether justified or not, we are constantly delivering death to the Muslim world. We do not see it very much, but they certainly do. Again, independent of justification, what do we think is going to happen if we continuously invade, occupy and bomb Muslim countries and arm and enable others to do so? Isn't it obvious that our five-front actions are going to cause at least some Muslims -- subjected to constant images of American troops in their world and dead Muslim civilians at our hands, even if unintended -- to want to return the violence? Just look at the bloodthirsty sentiments unleashed among Americans even from a failed Terrorist attempt. What sentiments do we think we're unleashing from a decade-long (and counting and increasing) multi-front "war" in the Muslim war?

There very well may be some small number of individuals who are so blinded by religious extremism that they will be devoted to random violence against civilians no matter what we do, but we are constantly maximizing the pool of recruits and sympathy among the population on which they depend. In other words, what we do constantly bolsters their efforts, and when we do, we always seem to move more in the direction of helping them even further. Ultimately, we should ask ourselves: if we drop more bombs on more Muslim countries, will there be fewer or more Muslims who want to blow up our airplanes and are willing to end their lives to do so? That question really answers itself.

Copyright ©2009 Salon Media Group, Inc.

Glenn Greenwald was previously a constitutional law and civil rights litigator in New York. He is the author of the New York Times Bestselling book "How Would a Patriot Act?," a critique of the Bush administration's use of executive power, released in May 2006. His second book, "A Tragic Legacy", examines the Bush legacy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://lee.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=57§iontree=35,57&itemid=1839 ...

Reps. Lee, McGovern, Jones and Colleagues ask Speaker for Up-Or-Down Vote on Military Escalation in Afghanistan

12/18/09

For Immediate Release
December 18, 2009
Contact: Nicole Y. Williams
(202) 225-2661

Washington, DC - Representatives Barbara Lee (D-CA), James McGovern (D-MA), and Walter Jones (R-NC) joined a bipartisan group of Members in delivering a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi requesting that Members of the House are provided the opportunity for a separate debate and up-or-down vote on the President's proposal to escalate the United States military presence in Afghanistan.

"President Obama spent three months reviewing and deliberating United States strategy in Afghanistan. At the very least, Congress owes our men and women in uniform an honest debate regarding the benefits, costs, affordability, and strategic importance of a military escalation," said Lee. "Our responsibility to ensure the U.S. is most effectively and sustainably combating terrorism around the globe will not be fulfilled by sidestepping this critical debate."

"President Obama's decision is a big deal, and Congress has a role to play," said Rep. McGovern. "We haven't had a full, meaningful debate about this critical issue in 8 years. Now is the time for Congress to act."

"Those of us who have signed this letter have differing views on how to move forward in Afghanistan," said Rep. Jones. "I, for example, do not believe that 'doubling down' on the strategy of propping up the Karzai regime in Afghanistan is the correct strategy, but rather we should work with and through the tribal structures that have existed in the country for centuries. We can all, however, agree that this is an issue that deserves a debate. The American people deserve a debate on something that could so deeply affect their loved ones and their country."  

The letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi expressed the urgency of holding such a vote prior to the deployment of additional troops to Afghanistan, or otherwise as soon as possible. It further reiterated the importance of Congress' role and responsibility in overseeing and providing for our nation's commitments while at war.

The text of the letter and list of co-signers follows:

December 18, 2009

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Speaker of the House
U.S. House of Representatives
Room H-232, U.S. Capitol
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Madam Speaker:

We write to urge you to ensure the House will hold a separate debate and floor vote on the President's proposal to escalate the United States military presence in Afghanistan.
President Obama has estimated that the deployment of 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan will increase the military costs of the war by $30 billion a year. Members may agree or disagree with the President's decision in pursuing a military escalation in Afghanistan, but we all appreciate your response to the President's announcement that "The American people and the Congress will now have an opportunity to fully examine this strategy."

At a time when the American economy continues to face enormous challenges and individuals across the country are struggling to get by, these costs are especially worthy of Congressional deliberation.
Congress's consideration of the President's revised policy in Afghanistan will be critical to reasserting the undisputed role and responsibility of the Legislative Branch in overseeing and providing for our nation's commitments while at war. To that end, when the resources required for the proposed troop increase are brought to the floor for consideration, we believe it is vital that the House is provided an opportunity for a robust floor debate and up-or-down vote on the issue of a military escalation. Ideally, this should occur prior to the deployment of any additional troops to Afghanistan, or otherwise as soon as possible.

Thank you for your leadership on this issue. We look forward to working with you to ensure Congress holds an honest and full debate regarding the benefits, costs, affordability, and strategic importance of a military escalation in Afghanistan.

Sincerely,

List of Co-signers:

Congresswoman Barbara Lee
Congressman James P. McGovern
Congressman Walter B. Jones
Congresswoman Lynn C. Woolsey
Congressman Eric J. J. Massa
Congressman Fortney Pete Stark
Congressman Raúl M. Grijalva
Congressman Bob Filner
Congressman Keith Ellison
Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin
Congressman Jerrold Nadler
Congressman José E. Serrano
Congressman Michael M. Honda
Congressman James P. Moran
Congressman Michael E. Capuano
Congresswoman Janice D. Schakowsky
Congressman Barney Frank
Congressman Peter A. DeFazio

cut county property taxes in HALF-- with tiny county-level income tax!...

Hi all...

[scroll down just a bit below to see how county property taxes could be cut in half with local income tax!]

Yep-- it's true-- last night even most of our County Legislature's Republican caucus (GOP Co. Leg.'s Gary Cooper, Rob Rolison, Suzanne Horn, Angela Flesland, John Forman, Marge Horton, and David Kelly)-- along with most of the Dem caucus (including me) voted to approve county tax levy for 2010...

[if this was irresponsibly rejected, $100 million in county property taxes couldn't be collected next year;
feel free to view webcast of last night's mini-mtg. here-- http://www.totalwebcasting.com/live/dutchess/ ]

So-- kudos to Cooper, Rolison, Horn, Flesland, Forman, Horton, and Kelly (and most of my own caucus) for following through on our bipartisan 21-4 promise/commitment made a few weeks ago to restore at least some (83%-- not enough) funding to various nonprofits and county departments cut/vetoed by the County Exec (thx to Dem leadership on these)-- so at least SOME funding was put back in for Human Rights Commission, school resource officers, deputy sheriffs, Grace Smith House, Cooperative Extension, DC Arts Council, Mental Health Assoc. of DC, Mid-Hudson Library Systems, Youth Bureau, Planning, DCDOH sanitarian/engineer, Comptroller accounting clerk, etc...

[click on these four links for reporting on last night's County Legislature meeting setting tax levy for '10:
http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20091229/NEWS01/912290321/Dutchess-property-tax-rate-to-rise-11 ; http://www.dailyfreeman.com/articles/2009/12/29/news/doc4b396e1886474565547946.txt
http://www.midhudsonnews.com/News/2009/December09/29/DCL_taxlevy-29Dec09.html ;
http://www.midhudsonnews.com/News/2009/December09/28/Steinhaus_2010-28Dec09.html ]

However...too many services still ended up getting cut; too many laid off-- while tax hike too high still!...

So-- join 111 other Dutchess folks for tax fairness now-- at http://www.PetitionOnline.com/SaveDuCo ...

...and email all 25 of us at countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us to avoid this madness next year!...

Fact: Several years ago Fiscal Policy Institute Ex. Dir. Frank Mauro crunched the numbers for Dutchess County and determined that county property taxes could literally be slashed in HALF-- with a local county-level income tax surcharge here for Dutchess of 10%; see http://www.FiscalPolicy.org these too:
http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/dutchessRPTlevies.htm ; http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/dutchess1999and2000.htm ;
http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/dutchess2001.htm ; http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/ImpactatDifferentIncomeLevels.htm .

[recall 2003 campaign of Fred Bunnell for County Exec-- for local income tax-- to slash property taxes!]

Fact: Even Molinaro, Miller for income tax hikes to cut property taxes; click these links to see for yourself:
http://assembly.state.ny.us/mem/?ad=103&sh=story&story=25529 ;
http://assembly.state.ny.us/member_files/102/20060628/ ;
http://propertytaxideas.nysenate.gov/akira/pmd/2174-3904 .

[...and Cahill has better proposal-- join 70+ signed to my http://www.PetitionOnline.com/FairTax effort]
[see much more on this @ http://www.petitiononline.com/fairtax ]

Recall similar recommendation from the Fiscal Policy Institute in their November 2006 report on NYS:

["One New York: An Agenda for Shared Prosperity" http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/OneNewYork~FPI.pdf ]

"The governor and the legislature should consider giving county governments the authority to levy a "piggyback" income tax for county government purposes. Such a tax could be structured like the income tax that the city of Yonkers is currently authorized to impose. The use of such an option would make a county's revenue system more progressive and place less of the burden on middle and lower income residents. The state tax system is now so distorted that the governor and the legislature should undertake a comprehensive review. An essential part of what the governor and the legislature should do, however, is to help localities to reduce property taxes by restoring
progressivity to state income taxes. In addition, the state government could give localities more flexibility in how they collect taxes, allowing them to move away from over-reliance on the property and sales taxes and instead raising funds through a local version of an income tax."

[see: "Restructuring New York City's Personal Income Tax: A Proposal from the Drum Major Institute":
http://www.drummajorinstitute.org/pdfs/DMI%20tax%20reform%20FINAL.pdf ; more re: NYC rates here:
http://www.nyc.gov/html/dof/html/pdf/interest_rates/pitrates.pdf ;
http://www.nyc.gov/html/dof/html/services/business_tax_nys_income.shtml ]

So again-- sign on to http://www.PetitionOnline.com/SaveDuCo -- and post comment in support of REAL tax reform now-- for US on Main Street-- not the fat cats on Wall Street-- join over 110 Dutchess folks signed on for local income tax to stop county property tax hikes, county sales tax being so high too!...
[ http://www.PetitionOnline.com/Fairness + http://www.petitiononline.com/stopcuts -- local income tax]

[if you thought THIS year's budget was horrific-- with budget cuts, layoffs, tax hike-- wait 'til next year; if we don't ALL get educated and activated NOW, folks-- to push for REAL tax reform-- we are done, folks!]

Again-- remember Orwell?..."In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act"...

Well, it's high time for a revolution, folks-- time for revolutionary truths below on taxes to get out now!...
[...and-- most definitely-- letters to editor to local papers needed to get these out asap-- need your help]

Seven facts on taxes, wealth, & economic development crucial to understanding/solving county taxes:
[call Paterson/state leg.'s asap on these-- (877) 255-9417-- and Congress at (800) 828-0498 too!]

Fact #1: Middle class New Yorkers now pay a much higher percentage of our income (over 11%) in state & local taxes than millionaires do (only 7%)-- when property and sales taxes are also considered.
[see: http://www.itepnet.org/wp2009/ny_whopays_factsheet.pdf ]

Fact #2: Millionaires now pay only a 35% federal income tax rate-- but they used to pay over a 90% rate back in the 50's under GOP President Eisenhower. [sign: http://www.PetitionOnline.com/ILikeIke ]

Fact #3: Millionaires now pay a state income tax rate less than 9%-- but they used pay over a 15% state income tax rate under GOP Gov. Rockefeller. [see: http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/taxhistory2.htm ]

Fact #4: The richest 1% of American households now own the same net worth as the other 95% of us.
http://hudson-valley.chronogram.com/issue/2009/11/News+&+Politics/Larry-Beinhart-s-Body-Politic
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/oct/01/michael-moore/moore-says-top-1-percent-owns-more-financial-wealt/

Fact #5: Almost 90% of all new jobs are from small business; property taxes, not income taxes kill them.
[see: http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/sbfaq.pdf ]

Fact #6: 98% of small business owners across the U.S. make less than $250,000/year (not super-rich).
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/oct/16/barack-obama/most-small-businesses-wont-be-subject-to-obamas-ta/

Fact #7: Up until 1981 there was a tiny tax on transactions/stock transfers on Wall Street; see:

[recall-- Working Families Party of NYS has been strong proponent of bringing this back for fairness]

"Taxing the Speculators" by Paul Krugman [NYTimes 11/27/09]
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/27/opinion/27krugman.html

"The Benefits of a Financial Transactions Tax" [Center for Economic Policy and Research]
http://www.cepr.net/index.php/publications/reports/the-benefits-of-a-financial-transactions-tax/

"Ferrer Proposes Return of Tax on Stock Trades to Aid Schools" [New York Times 4/19/05]
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D02E0DA1F3EF93AA25757C0A9639C8B63 ...

"A Stock Transfer Tax: The Right Medicine for Wall Street" by Dean Baker [3/15/08]
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/15/a_stock_transfer_tax_the_right/

"Big Idea: Tax the Street" by J.W. Mason [City Limits Magazine 9-10/02]
http://www.citylimits.org/content/articles/viewarticle.cfm?article_id=2806 ...

[Question: Who out there would like to join yours truly in starting a local chapter of TEA PARTY Dutchess?...(Taxed Enough Already-- Push for Action for Rich to be Taxed: Yes!)...(house parties soon);
yes-- also starting chapter of BUFT too-- Businesses for Fair Taxation-- let me know if you're interested!]

Recall NYTimes' Dec. 2nd "Misguided Tax Revolt" editorial re: Nassau County election-- referred to Suozzi-- but easily applicable to Dutchess-- http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/02/opinion/02wed2.html ...

And don't forget-- even budget analysts hired by Co. Leg. have found gaping budget hole for 2011!...
[recall-- http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20091205/NEWS01/912050320 ]

[as always, PLEASE share your sentiments with all 25 of us at countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us]

Pass it on...

Joel
242-3571/876-2488
joeltyner@earthlink.net

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

And-- let's not forget these cuts we Dems tried to avoid, but Co. Exec, GOP sadly bent on, happened:

[yep-- these cuts went through, folks-- let's keep an eye on how these cuts affect services in 2010!]

-- $26,000 cut to the Dutchess County Office of Veterans Affairs (part-time employee laid off)

-- $209,839 cut to Dutchess County Community Action Agency (meaning less services, layoffs)

-- $165,960 cut to the Astor Home for Children (meaning less services, layoffs)

-- $114,000 cut to Family Services (meaning less services for the most vulnerable in our county)

-- $106,987 cut to Hudson River Housing (in the midst of worst housing/foreclosure crisis in decades)

-- $56,553 cut to the Lexington Center for Recovery (shortfunding methadone clinic for heroin addicts)

-- $28,111 cut to the Mediation Center of Dutchess County (shortfunding great cost-effective program)

[...and hundreds of thousands of dollars in cuts to our county's Board of Elections-- meaning cruel, stupid layoffs!...just before 2010-- BOE might be dealing w/new optical scanners, two Sen. elections!...]

We Dems tried to override the County Exec's vetoes/cuts on most of these above-- GOP stopped us;
don't believe me; see for yourself here, folks-- http://www.totalwebcasting.com/view/?id=dutchess ...

And-- besides all of the above, earlier this month there was bipartisan agreement agreed to by 21 of 25 legislators to lower our county workforce to 35 LESS county employees than Dutchess County had back in 1987, funding was cut 17% (by over $800,000) to practically all of our county's nonprofits, four women with about 20 years' experience each working for our county were laid off from our county's Long-Term Home Health Care Program-- and our county's ten Office for the Aging Senior Friendship Centers are shifting from five-day weeks to four-day weeks (I know for a fact that seniors' and workers' hearts are breaking from these; I tried with amendments in Dec. to stop all these cuts, to no avail)...

[budget cuts are NOT helpful in recession; recall CBPP/FPI: http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/10-30-01sfp.pdf ]

Recall alternative cost-savers I've proposed @ http://www.PetitionOnline.com/SaveDuCo ; 111 on board; see "view current signatures" to see comments < 101 from across county in support; join us, sign on; Canadian Rx option for county employees, bail loans, MEGA membership would save millions!...
http://www.MEGAEnergy.org http://www.PetitionOnline.com/SaveOnRx http://wwwOARTompkins.com ;
note as well-- part of this petition calls for a fundamentally different way to fund county services; see below...even if it's just 10% or 20% of county budget that comes from income tax, would work wonders...

Undeniable fact remains that even compromise budget arrived at 2 weeks ago mean cuts and layoffs;
Dems led way getting GOP to restore 83% of 2010 funding for these 14 agencies but these cuts remain:

-- an unsustainable and unfair cut of $185,000 to Cornell Cooperative Extension-- people will be hurt

-- an unsustainable and unfair cut of $113,000 to Hudson River Housing-- yes, people will be hurt

-- an unsustainable and unfair cut of $111,000 to Grace Smith House-- yes, people will be hurt

-- an unsustainable and unfair cut of $100,000 to Community Action Partnership-- people will be hurt

-- an unsustainable and unfair cut of $87,000 to Astor Home for Children-- yes, people will be hurt

-- an unsustainable and unfair cut of $55,000 to Dutchess County Arts Council-- people will be hurt

-- an unsustainable and unfair cut of $41,000 to Mid-Hudson Library System-- people will be hurt

-- an unsustainable and unfair cut of $23,000 to Mental Health Association of Du. Co.-- people hurt

-- an unsustainable and unfair cut of $23,000 to BOCES (transition/re-entry)-- yes, people will be hurt

-- an unsustainable and unfair cut of $21,000 to the Mediation Center of Du. Co.-- people will be hurt

-- an unsustainable and unfair cut of $11,000 to Lexington Center-- yes, people will be hurt

-- an unsustainable and unfair cut of $3000 to Literacy Connections-- yes, people will be hurt

It didn't have to be like this-- recall proven, common-sense revenue alternatives we could do here:

Municipal Electricity/Gas Alliance membership (as in 23 co.'s)...........$300,000 in new revenue

Canadian Rx option for county employees/retirees (as in 5 co.'s)......$1.5 million in new revenue

Bail loan fund for some accused of nonviolent misdemeanors...........$1 million in new revenue

[again-- for much, much more on how these three programs have been PROVEN to work in other co.'s--
[ http://www.MEGAEnergy.org http://www.PetitionOnline.com/SaveOnRx http://wwwOARTompkins.com ]

Again-- one more reason our county's senior home care program shouldn't have been eliminated is that It's also been proven repeatedly that a robust system of community-based senior home care saves tons of money for families-- and tons of tax dollars compared to nursing home placements for those same seniors. As Robert Gumson, Unit Manager for VESID Independent Living Services, told all of us assembled at the Taconic Resources for Independence's 19th Annual Celebration of the Americans with Disabilities Act (at Wallace Center in Hyde Park this July), literally sixty to seventy percent of all senior citizens in nursing homes here in New York State don't need to be there-- and many tax dollars could be saved locally if Dutchess County followed the good examples of Warren and Washington counties and took advantage of Pataki-era Medicaid waiver program to expand home care for seniors...
[see: http://www.ADAPT.org ; http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/07/19/finally_long_term_home_health_care/ ; http://homecaremag.com/news/aarp-endorses-empowered-home-act-20090608/ ]

"Marist College economic Professor Ann Davis said that it is possible that government spending may be a stabilizing factor in a down economy by maintaining jobs and services.  'You have to look at what would have been cut and who is being taxed,' she said. The tax rate and levy increases might not necessarily be bad for the economy, Davis said."
http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20091211/OPINION01/912110312/1004/opinion/Editorial--Legislature-s-2010-budget-must-not-stand

...and...both Goldberg and Cooper hit the nail on the head with their quotes in Dec. 11 paper too:

Majority Leader Sandra Goldberg, D-Wappinger, argued Steinhaus' proposals would shift costs onto municipalities, which would force them to increase local taxes.  "If we push costs down to the towns, then we are no better than the state pushing costs down to the county," Goldberg said. To those who are angry about the tax increase, Minority Leader Gary Cooper, R-Pine Plains, said, "Do you believe that county government should provide public safety? I happen to believe that should be the core mission of county government."
http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20091211/NEWS01/912110341/Dutchess-taxpayers-fume-over-proposed-tax-levy-increase

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Below from today's paper's, then...

Dutchess Property Tax Tate To Rise 11%
JENNY LEE-ADRIAN * POUGHKEEPSIE JOURNAL * DECEMBER 29, 2009
http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20091229/NEWS01/912290321/Dutchess-property-tax-rate-to-rise-11-

The Legislature approved 16-6 Monday the county property tax levy and tax rate.

The "yes" votes: Chairman Roger Higgins, D-New Hamburg; Majority Leader Sandra Goldberg, D-Wappinger; Assistant Majority Leader Margaret Fettes, D-Millbrook; Minority Leader Gary Cooper, R-Pine Plains; Assistant Minority Leader Robert Rolison, R-City of Poughkeepsie; Legislators Suzanne Horn, R-Pleasant Valley; Richard Keller-Coffey, D-Town of Poughkeepsie; Angela Flesland, R-Town of Poughkeepsie; Dan Kuffner, D-Hyde Park; Steve White, D-City of Poughkeepsie; Barbara Jeter-Jackson, D-City of Poughkeepsie; Joel Tyner, D-Clinton; Alison MacAvery, D-Town of Fishkill; John Forman, R-Beacon; Marge Horton, R-Town of East Fishkill; and David Kelly, R-Pawling.

The "no" votes: Legislators James Doxsey, C-Town of Poughkeepsie; Dale Borchert, R-LaGrange; Robert Weiss, R-Town of East Fishkill; James Miccio, R-Village of Fishkill; Gerald Hutchings, R-Beekman; and Peter Wassell, D-Dover.

Legislators Diane Nash, D-Hyde Park; William McCabe, D-Union Vale; and Tom Mansfield, D-Red Hook, were absent.

Most Dutchess County property owners will see a more than 11 percent increase in the county property tax rate for next year.

The Legislature approved 16-6 Monday night a $100.8 million county property tax levy for 2010 - a 6.5 percent increase from the 2009 tax levy of $94.6 million.

The property tax levy is the amount to be collected in taxes.

In most municipalities, the 2010 county property tax rate will be $2.83 per $1,000 of assessed value compared with $2.54 in 2009.

Monday's meeting wrapped up a contentious budget process, in which County Executive William Steinhaus proposed cuts and new revenues that affected jobs and services. Democratic and Republican legislators negotiated over what to keep or cut. Although an agreement between both caucuses to have nine Democrats and nine Republicans vote to override vetoes disintegrated , many legislators still chose to override most of Steinhaus' 150 vetoes on Dec. 17, which increased the property tax levy for next year.

Legislators James Doxsey, C-Town of Poughkeepsie; Dale Borchert, R-LaGrange; Robert Weiss, R-Town of East Fishkill; James Miccio, R-Village of Fishkill; Gerald Hutchings, R-Beekman; and Peter Wassell, D-Dover, voted Monday against the property tax levy. Legislators Diane Nash, D-Hyde Park; William McCabe, D-Union Vale; and Tom Mansfield, D-Red Hook, were absent.

PROPERTY TAX RATES BY MUNICIPALITY

For the 2010 county budget, the Dutchess County Legislature approved Monday the county property tax rates for towns and cities. The dollar amounts represent the rate per $1,000 of assessed value. The rates vary from town to town based on equalization rates, which are the ratio between a property's assessed value and what the state estimates is that property's market value.

2010 rate Change from 2009

Amenia $2.83 11.4%
Beekman $2.83 11.4%
Clinton $2.83 -32.9%
Dover $6.75 6.3%
East Fishkill $2.83 11.4%
Fishkill $2.83 11.4%
Hyde Park $6.16 9.0%
LaGrange $2.83 11.4%
Milan $2.83 11.4%
North East $3.06 11.3%
Pawling $8.59 6.4%
Pine Plains $7.92 9.1%
Pleasant Valley $5.45 3.0%
Town of Poughkeepsie $2.83 11.4%
Red Hook $2.83 11.4%
Rhinebeck $2.83 11.4%
Stanford $5.81 7.4%
Union Vale $2.83 11.4%
Wappinger $2.83 11.4%
Beacon $2.83 11.4%
City of Poughkeepsie $2.83 11.4%

Source: Dutchess County Real Property Tax Agency

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://www.dailyfreeman.com/articles/2009/12/29/news/doc4b396e1886474565547946.txt ...

Dutchess 6.52% tax levy hike OK'd
Published: Tuesday, December 29, 2009
By WILLIAM J. KEMBLE
Correspondent

POUGHKEEPSIE - Dutchess County lawmakers on Monday adopted a $100.78 million property tax levy with a 6.52 percent increase of $6.17 million.

The levy and accompanying tax rates were approved during a county Legislature meeting a week after it adopted a $400.89 million budget carrying a 1.09 percent increase of $4.33 million.

Northern Dutchess town tax rates per $1,000 assessed valuation for Red Hook, Rhinebeck, and Milan are $2.83 for an 11.42 percent increase of 29 cents; Hyde Park at $6.16 for a 9.03 percent increase of 51 cents; and Pine Plains at $7.92 for a 9.09 percent increase of 66 cents.

Approval of the levy in the 16-6 vote ended a month-long budget battle that had lawmakers overturn about $1.12 million in vetoes by Republican County Executive William Steinhaus but let $723,744 in cuts stand and remain locked in a court dispute over whether his authority extends to partial vetoes within spending lines accounting for another $1.04 million.

The majority Democrats, who have a 14-11 majority but will become the minority party at 18-7 in 2010, appeared to have reached an agreement with Republicans on Dec. 7 to overturn a total of $2.89 million in vetoes until the case was filed.

Majority Leader Sandra Goldberg, D-Wappingers Falls, during the debate over vetoes said Steinhaus has sought to work against having political parties cooperate during budget talks.

"This has been the County Executive's track record in the past," she said. "We worked very hard with the other side that the original vote was a bipartisan vote. Both sides came together. We had long discussions. We each gave in on some things and we each accepted things so we could move forward in a bipartisan way that we felt was best for the residents of Dutchess County."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://www.midhudsonnews.com/News/2009/December09/29/DCL_taxlevy-29Dec09.html ...

Dutchess lawmakers meet for five minutes to set tax levy

POUGHKEEPSIE - Dutchess County lawmakers met for about five minutes Monday evening to vote on the tax levy for the county's 2010 budget.

Legislators voted against the $100.8 million levy, which will amount to about an 11 percent increase for most homeowners. Six legislators - four Republicans, one Democrat and one Conservative - voted against the levy. 

The vote, during the brief Monday night session, ends a particularly contentious budget process, that saw the legislature spend several late nights debating the budget before restoring many cuts proposed by County Executive William Steinhaus, who then issued more than 100 vetoes. The legislature put in another long night overriding many of the vetoes. Some were sustained. 

Legislature Chairman Roger Higgins ends his 19 year career on the legislature, saying that his tenure was very rewarding.

"I think it's important for all of us to give back to our community one way or another, whether it's in government, coaching kids in little league or soccer or working with our younger people in scouting, or on our library boards, it's important for all of us to contribute, to give back to the community," he said. "And that's what makes each of our communities all throughout the Hudson Valley so important and such a wonderful place to live."

Higgins, presided over the legislature during the four years the Democrats were the majority. He lost his reelection bid in November to Republican Joseph Incoronato. Even some Republicans wished Democrat Higgins well in his future endeavors. 

The Republicans regained their traditional control in November, and will have a 'veto-proof' majority for the next two years.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://www.midhudsonnews.com/News/2009/December09/28/Steinhaus_2010-28Dec09.html ...

Steinhaus expects at least one more year of belt tightening

POUGHKEEPSIE - Dutchess County Executive William Steinhaus believes there won't be any economic turnaround in 2010. In fact, he thinks things won't start to get better for another year.

Steinhaus proposed in his county 2010 budget to cut funding to contract agencies and reduce services to taxpayers, said that will have to continue or else taxes will surely increase.

"We in county government have to learn how to plow snow more efficiently and effectively, and provide human services and health services and other work that we do with veterans and children and senior citizens, we just have to be smarter and lean as we do it," he said.

Steinhaus and the county legislature locked horns over spending this winter, with lawmakers overriding many of his vetoes.

The legislature has one final session scheduled tonight. Chairman Roger Higgins says he expects the meeting, called primarily to set the 2010 tax levy, to be very brief, unlike the marathon sessions earlier this month to wrap up the budget.